A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection

Norman S. Turner, William J. Shaughnessy, Emily J. Berg, Dirk R. Larson, Arlen D. Hanssen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to accurately screen and select orthopaedic resident applicants with eventual successful outcomes has been historically difficult. Many preresidency selection variables are subjective in nature and a more standardized objective scoring method seems desirable. A quantitative composite scoring tool (QCST) to be used in a standardized manner to help predict orthopaedic residency performance from application materials was developed. In 64 orthopaedic residents, four predictors (United States Medical Licensing Examination [USMLE] Part I scores, Alpha Omega Alpha status, junior year clinical clerkship honors grades, and the QCST score) were analyzed with respect to four residency outcomes assessments. The outcomes included three standardized assessments, the orthopaedic in-training examination scores (OITE), the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) written and oral examinations, and an internal outcomes assessment, attainment of satisfactory chief resident associate (CRA) status. Collectively, the QCST score had the strongest association as a predictor for all three standardized outcomes assessments (p < 0.001). Honors grades during junior years clinical clerkships was most strongly associated with satisfactory CRA status (p < 0.001). A composite scoring tool that is an effective predictor of orthopaedic resident outcomes can be developed. Additional work is still required to refine this scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number449
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Orthopedics
Clinical Clerkship
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Oral Diagnosis
Licensure
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection. / Turner, Norman S.; Shaughnessy, William J.; Berg, Emily J.; Larson, Dirk R.; Hanssen, Arlen D.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 449, 08.2006, p. 50-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turner, Norman S. ; Shaughnessy, William J. ; Berg, Emily J. ; Larson, Dirk R. ; Hanssen, Arlen D. / A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006 ; No. 449. pp. 50-55.
@article{126bf50497054e0292a84993ff33c525,
title = "A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection",
abstract = "The ability to accurately screen and select orthopaedic resident applicants with eventual successful outcomes has been historically difficult. Many preresidency selection variables are subjective in nature and a more standardized objective scoring method seems desirable. A quantitative composite scoring tool (QCST) to be used in a standardized manner to help predict orthopaedic residency performance from application materials was developed. In 64 orthopaedic residents, four predictors (United States Medical Licensing Examination [USMLE] Part I scores, Alpha Omega Alpha status, junior year clinical clerkship honors grades, and the QCST score) were analyzed with respect to four residency outcomes assessments. The outcomes included three standardized assessments, the orthopaedic in-training examination scores (OITE), the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) written and oral examinations, and an internal outcomes assessment, attainment of satisfactory chief resident associate (CRA) status. Collectively, the QCST score had the strongest association as a predictor for all three standardized outcomes assessments (p < 0.001). Honors grades during junior years clinical clerkships was most strongly associated with satisfactory CRA status (p < 0.001). A composite scoring tool that is an effective predictor of orthopaedic resident outcomes can be developed. Additional work is still required to refine this scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection.",
author = "Turner, {Norman S.} and Shaughnessy, {William J.} and Berg, {Emily J.} and Larson, {Dirk R.} and Hanssen, {Arlen D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/01.blo.0000224042.84839.44",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "50--55",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "449",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative composite scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection

AU - Turner, Norman S.

AU - Shaughnessy, William J.

AU - Berg, Emily J.

AU - Larson, Dirk R.

AU - Hanssen, Arlen D.

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - The ability to accurately screen and select orthopaedic resident applicants with eventual successful outcomes has been historically difficult. Many preresidency selection variables are subjective in nature and a more standardized objective scoring method seems desirable. A quantitative composite scoring tool (QCST) to be used in a standardized manner to help predict orthopaedic residency performance from application materials was developed. In 64 orthopaedic residents, four predictors (United States Medical Licensing Examination [USMLE] Part I scores, Alpha Omega Alpha status, junior year clinical clerkship honors grades, and the QCST score) were analyzed with respect to four residency outcomes assessments. The outcomes included three standardized assessments, the orthopaedic in-training examination scores (OITE), the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) written and oral examinations, and an internal outcomes assessment, attainment of satisfactory chief resident associate (CRA) status. Collectively, the QCST score had the strongest association as a predictor for all three standardized outcomes assessments (p < 0.001). Honors grades during junior years clinical clerkships was most strongly associated with satisfactory CRA status (p < 0.001). A composite scoring tool that is an effective predictor of orthopaedic resident outcomes can be developed. Additional work is still required to refine this scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection.

AB - The ability to accurately screen and select orthopaedic resident applicants with eventual successful outcomes has been historically difficult. Many preresidency selection variables are subjective in nature and a more standardized objective scoring method seems desirable. A quantitative composite scoring tool (QCST) to be used in a standardized manner to help predict orthopaedic residency performance from application materials was developed. In 64 orthopaedic residents, four predictors (United States Medical Licensing Examination [USMLE] Part I scores, Alpha Omega Alpha status, junior year clinical clerkship honors grades, and the QCST score) were analyzed with respect to four residency outcomes assessments. The outcomes included three standardized assessments, the orthopaedic in-training examination scores (OITE), the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) written and oral examinations, and an internal outcomes assessment, attainment of satisfactory chief resident associate (CRA) status. Collectively, the QCST score had the strongest association as a predictor for all three standardized outcomes assessments (p < 0.001). Honors grades during junior years clinical clerkships was most strongly associated with satisfactory CRA status (p < 0.001). A composite scoring tool that is an effective predictor of orthopaedic resident outcomes can be developed. Additional work is still required to refine this scoring tool for orthopaedic residency screening and selection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747201658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747201658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.blo.0000224042.84839.44

DO - 10.1097/01.blo.0000224042.84839.44

M3 - Article

C2 - 16735881

AN - SCOPUS:33747201658

SP - 50

EP - 55

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 449

ER -