A quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy.

Tao Wu, Joel P. Felmlee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we propose a quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) ablation treatment to assess FUS beam positioning accuracy, FUS power delivery accuracy, MR imaging quality, and FUS ablation system safety. A total of 353 sonication points in Lucite cards were measured, the average placement errors were -0.06 mm in the SI direction and -0.04 mm in the LR direction. Temperature elevation was calculated from MR phase difference images and the measured water proton chemical shift (WPCS) temperature coefficient. WPCS temperature calibration for phantoms yielded a temperature coefficient of 0.011 ppm/degree C. Sixteen experiments were conducted using six different phantoms to test the reliability of FUS power delivery. SNR and RF power calculated from phantom images were analyzed and stored at the MR console. A computer program was developed to integrate the system power delivery and the MR image quality control into one automated process. In the clinical trial at our institution, we expect this quality control program to be carried out before each patient treatment. If measured quality control values exceeds or below the preset values, a system service and retest should be conducted before the treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-167
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

quality control
Ablation
Quality Control
ablation
Quality control
therapy
Ultrasonics
delivery
Temperature
chemical equilibrium
Protons
Chemical shift
consoles
Sonication
temperature
protons
Water
Patient treatment
International System of Units
cards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

A quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy. / Wu, Tao; Felmlee, Joel P.

In: Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.01.2002, p. 162-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25cf7a9787d04ffa82ea02fba0375c95,
title = "A quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy.",
abstract = "In this study, we propose a quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) ablation treatment to assess FUS beam positioning accuracy, FUS power delivery accuracy, MR imaging quality, and FUS ablation system safety. A total of 353 sonication points in Lucite cards were measured, the average placement errors were -0.06 mm in the SI direction and -0.04 mm in the LR direction. Temperature elevation was calculated from MR phase difference images and the measured water proton chemical shift (WPCS) temperature coefficient. WPCS temperature calibration for phantoms yielded a temperature coefficient of 0.011 ppm/degree C. Sixteen experiments were conducted using six different phantoms to test the reliability of FUS power delivery. SNR and RF power calculated from phantom images were analyzed and stored at the MR console. A computer program was developed to integrate the system power delivery and the MR image quality control into one automated process. In the clinical trial at our institution, we expect this quality control program to be carried out before each patient treatment. If measured quality control values exceeds or below the preset values, a system service and retest should be conducted before the treatment.",
author = "Tao Wu and Felmlee, {Joel P.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2584",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "162--167",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy.

AU - Wu, Tao

AU - Felmlee, Joel P.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - In this study, we propose a quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) ablation treatment to assess FUS beam positioning accuracy, FUS power delivery accuracy, MR imaging quality, and FUS ablation system safety. A total of 353 sonication points in Lucite cards were measured, the average placement errors were -0.06 mm in the SI direction and -0.04 mm in the LR direction. Temperature elevation was calculated from MR phase difference images and the measured water proton chemical shift (WPCS) temperature coefficient. WPCS temperature calibration for phantoms yielded a temperature coefficient of 0.011 ppm/degree C. Sixteen experiments were conducted using six different phantoms to test the reliability of FUS power delivery. SNR and RF power calculated from phantom images were analyzed and stored at the MR console. A computer program was developed to integrate the system power delivery and the MR image quality control into one automated process. In the clinical trial at our institution, we expect this quality control program to be carried out before each patient treatment. If measured quality control values exceeds or below the preset values, a system service and retest should be conducted before the treatment.

AB - In this study, we propose a quality control program for MR-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) ablation treatment to assess FUS beam positioning accuracy, FUS power delivery accuracy, MR imaging quality, and FUS ablation system safety. A total of 353 sonication points in Lucite cards were measured, the average placement errors were -0.06 mm in the SI direction and -0.04 mm in the LR direction. Temperature elevation was calculated from MR phase difference images and the measured water proton chemical shift (WPCS) temperature coefficient. WPCS temperature calibration for phantoms yielded a temperature coefficient of 0.011 ppm/degree C. Sixteen experiments were conducted using six different phantoms to test the reliability of FUS power delivery. SNR and RF power calculated from phantom images were analyzed and stored at the MR console. A computer program was developed to integrate the system power delivery and the MR image quality control into one automated process. In the clinical trial at our institution, we expect this quality control program to be carried out before each patient treatment. If measured quality control values exceeds or below the preset values, a system service and retest should be conducted before the treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024996093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024996093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2584

DO - 10.1120/jacmp.v3i2.2584

M3 - Article

C2 - 11958655

AN - SCOPUS:85024996093

VL - 3

SP - 162

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 2

ER -