A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National ...

Stephen A. Boorjian, Michael L. Blute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Full title. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG); Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Department of Urology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Objectives: This study compared the complications and the cancer control of elective nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with a small (≤5 cm), solitary, low-stage N0 M0 tumor suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and a normal contralateral kidney. Methods: Five hundred forty-one patients were randomized in a prospective, multicenter, Phase 3 trial to undergo NSS (n = 268) or RN (n = 273) together with a limited lymph node dissection. Results: This publication reports only on the complications reported for both surgical methods. The rate of perioperative blood loss was slightly higher after RN (96.0% vs. 87.2%) and the rate of severe hemorrhage was slightly higher after NSS (3.1% vs. 1.2%). Ten patients (4.4%), all of whom were treated with NSS, developed urinary fistulas. Pleural damage (11.5% for NSS vs. 9.3% for RN) and spleen damage (0.4% for NSS and 0.4% for RN) were observed with similar rates in both groups. Postoperative computed tomography scanning abnormalities were seen in 5.8% of NSS and 2.0% of RN patients. Reoperation for complications was necessary in 4.4% of NSS and 2.4% of RN patients. Conclusions: NSS for small, easily resectable, incidentally discovered RCC in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney can be performed safely with slightly higher complication rates than after RN. The oncologic results are eagerly awaited to confirm that NSS is an acceptable approach for small asymptomatic RCC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-102
Number of pages2
JournalUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nephrons
Nephrectomy
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Organizations
Research
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Urinary Fistula
Kidney
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Belgium
Urology
Lymph Node Excision
Reoperation
Canada
Spleen
Tomography
Clinical Trials
Hemorrhage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Urology

Cite this

@article{e6740fec7c854ba1b493c7b112d1bd94,
title = "A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National ...",
abstract = "Full title. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG); Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Department of Urology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Objectives: This study compared the complications and the cancer control of elective nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with a small (≤5 cm), solitary, low-stage N0 M0 tumor suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and a normal contralateral kidney. Methods: Five hundred forty-one patients were randomized in a prospective, multicenter, Phase 3 trial to undergo NSS (n = 268) or RN (n = 273) together with a limited lymph node dissection. Results: This publication reports only on the complications reported for both surgical methods. The rate of perioperative blood loss was slightly higher after RN (96.0{\%} vs. 87.2{\%}) and the rate of severe hemorrhage was slightly higher after NSS (3.1{\%} vs. 1.2{\%}). Ten patients (4.4{\%}), all of whom were treated with NSS, developed urinary fistulas. Pleural damage (11.5{\%} for NSS vs. 9.3{\%} for RN) and spleen damage (0.4{\%} for NSS and 0.4{\%} for RN) were observed with similar rates in both groups. Postoperative computed tomography scanning abnormalities were seen in 5.8{\%} of NSS and 2.0{\%} of RN patients. Reoperation for complications was necessary in 4.4{\%} of NSS and 2.4{\%} of RN patients. Conclusions: NSS for small, easily resectable, incidentally discovered RCC in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney can be performed safely with slightly higher complication rates than after RN. The oncologic results are eagerly awaited to confirm that NSS is an acceptable approach for small asymptomatic RCC.",
author = "Boorjian, {Stephen A.} and Blute, {Michael L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "101--102",
journal = "Urologic Oncology",
issn = "1078-1439",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National ...

AU - Boorjian, Stephen A.

AU - Blute, Michael L.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Full title. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG); Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Department of Urology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Objectives: This study compared the complications and the cancer control of elective nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with a small (≤5 cm), solitary, low-stage N0 M0 tumor suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and a normal contralateral kidney. Methods: Five hundred forty-one patients were randomized in a prospective, multicenter, Phase 3 trial to undergo NSS (n = 268) or RN (n = 273) together with a limited lymph node dissection. Results: This publication reports only on the complications reported for both surgical methods. The rate of perioperative blood loss was slightly higher after RN (96.0% vs. 87.2%) and the rate of severe hemorrhage was slightly higher after NSS (3.1% vs. 1.2%). Ten patients (4.4%), all of whom were treated with NSS, developed urinary fistulas. Pleural damage (11.5% for NSS vs. 9.3% for RN) and spleen damage (0.4% for NSS and 0.4% for RN) were observed with similar rates in both groups. Postoperative computed tomography scanning abnormalities were seen in 5.8% of NSS and 2.0% of RN patients. Reoperation for complications was necessary in 4.4% of NSS and 2.4% of RN patients. Conclusions: NSS for small, easily resectable, incidentally discovered RCC in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney can be performed safely with slightly higher complication rates than after RN. The oncologic results are eagerly awaited to confirm that NSS is an acceptable approach for small asymptomatic RCC.

AB - Full title. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, Matveev V, Bono A, Borkowski A, Marechal JM, Klotz L, Skinner E, Keane T, Claessens I, Sylvester R, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG); Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Department of Urology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Objectives: This study compared the complications and the cancer control of elective nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in patients with a small (≤5 cm), solitary, low-stage N0 M0 tumor suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and a normal contralateral kidney. Methods: Five hundred forty-one patients were randomized in a prospective, multicenter, Phase 3 trial to undergo NSS (n = 268) or RN (n = 273) together with a limited lymph node dissection. Results: This publication reports only on the complications reported for both surgical methods. The rate of perioperative blood loss was slightly higher after RN (96.0% vs. 87.2%) and the rate of severe hemorrhage was slightly higher after NSS (3.1% vs. 1.2%). Ten patients (4.4%), all of whom were treated with NSS, developed urinary fistulas. Pleural damage (11.5% for NSS vs. 9.3% for RN) and spleen damage (0.4% for NSS and 0.4% for RN) were observed with similar rates in both groups. Postoperative computed tomography scanning abnormalities were seen in 5.8% of NSS and 2.0% of RN patients. Reoperation for complications was necessary in 4.4% of NSS and 2.4% of RN patients. Conclusions: NSS for small, easily resectable, incidentally discovered RCC in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney can be performed safely with slightly higher complication rates than after RN. The oncologic results are eagerly awaited to confirm that NSS is an acceptable approach for small asymptomatic RCC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37749032714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37749032714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.017

DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.017

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 101

EP - 102

JO - Urologic Oncology

JF - Urologic Oncology

SN - 1078-1439

IS - 1

ER -