A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies

E. Kalogera, C. C. Nitschmann, Sean Christopher Dowdy, William Arthur Cliby, C. L. Langstraat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% (P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-347
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume144
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Anastomotic Leak
Neoplasms
Quality Improvement
Pelvis
Dehydration
Albumins
Radiation
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Anastomotic leak
  • Large bowel resection
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Protective stoma
  • Rectosigmoid resection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies. / Kalogera, E.; Nitschmann, C. C.; Dowdy, Sean Christopher; Cliby, William Arthur; Langstraat, C. L.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 144, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 343-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7337f723e6e4cb39c040ca2cc6c51bf,
title = "A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies",
abstract = "Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1{\%}) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1{\%}) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3{\%}) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3{\%}) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3{\%} (1/77) vs. 7.8{\%} (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6{\%} (2/77) vs. 7.8{\%} (P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9{\%}) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9{\%}) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.",
keywords = "Anastomotic leak, Large bowel resection, Ovarian cancer, Protective stoma, Rectosigmoid resection",
author = "E. Kalogera and Nitschmann, {C. C.} and Dowdy, {Sean Christopher} and Cliby, {William Arthur} and Langstraat, {C. L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "343--347",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies

AU - Kalogera, E.

AU - Nitschmann, C. C.

AU - Dowdy, Sean Christopher

AU - Cliby, William Arthur

AU - Langstraat, C. L.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% (P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.

AB - Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% (P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.

KW - Anastomotic leak

KW - Large bowel resection

KW - Ovarian cancer

KW - Protective stoma

KW - Rectosigmoid resection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007415353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007415353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 343

EP - 347

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 2

ER -