TY - JOUR
T1 - A Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial of the TLPLDC Vaccine as Adjuvant Therapy After Surgical Resection of Stage III/IV Melanoma
T2 - A Primary Analysis
AU - Vreeland, Timothy J.
AU - Clifton, Guy T.
AU - Hale, Diane F.
AU - Chick, Robert C.
AU - Hickerson, Annelies T.
AU - Cindass, Jessica L.
AU - Adams, Alexandra M.
AU - Bohan, Phillip M.Kemp
AU - Andtbacka, Robert H.I.
AU - Berger, Adam C.
AU - Jakub, James W.
AU - Sussman, Jeffrey J.
AU - Terando, Alicia M.
AU - Wagner, Thomas
AU - Peoples, George E.
AU - Faries, Mark B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by Elios Therapeutics.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background: Melanoma therapy has changed dramatically over the last decade with improvements in immunotherapy, yet many patients do not respond to current therapies. This novel vaccine strategy may prime a patient’s immune system against their tumor and work synergistically with immunotherapy against advanced-stage melanoma. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine administered to prevent recurrence in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma. Patients were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the TLPLDC vaccine or placebo (empty yeast cell wall particles and autologous dendritic cells). Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per treatment (PT) analyses were predefined, with PT analysis including patients who remained disease-free through the primary vaccine/placebo series (6 months). Results: A total of 144 patients were randomized (103 vaccine, 41 control). Therapy was well-tolerated with similar toxicity between treatment arms; one patient in each group experienced related serious adverse events. While disease-free survival (DFS) was not different between groups in ITT analysis, in PT analysis the vaccine group showed improved 24-month DFS (62.9% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.041). Conclusions: This phase IIb trial of TLPLDC vaccine administered to patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma shows TLPLDC is well-tolerated and improves DFS in patients who complete the primary vaccine series. This suggests patients who do not recur early benefit from TLPLDC in preventing future recurrence from melanoma. A phase III trial of TLPLDC + checkpoint inhibitor versus checkpoint inhibitor alone in patients with advanced, surgically resected melanoma is under development. Trial Registration: NCT02301611.
AB - Background: Melanoma therapy has changed dramatically over the last decade with improvements in immunotherapy, yet many patients do not respond to current therapies. This novel vaccine strategy may prime a patient’s immune system against their tumor and work synergistically with immunotherapy against advanced-stage melanoma. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine administered to prevent recurrence in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma. Patients were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the TLPLDC vaccine or placebo (empty yeast cell wall particles and autologous dendritic cells). Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per treatment (PT) analyses were predefined, with PT analysis including patients who remained disease-free through the primary vaccine/placebo series (6 months). Results: A total of 144 patients were randomized (103 vaccine, 41 control). Therapy was well-tolerated with similar toxicity between treatment arms; one patient in each group experienced related serious adverse events. While disease-free survival (DFS) was not different between groups in ITT analysis, in PT analysis the vaccine group showed improved 24-month DFS (62.9% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.041). Conclusions: This phase IIb trial of TLPLDC vaccine administered to patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma shows TLPLDC is well-tolerated and improves DFS in patients who complete the primary vaccine series. This suggests patients who do not recur early benefit from TLPLDC in preventing future recurrence from melanoma. A phase III trial of TLPLDC + checkpoint inhibitor versus checkpoint inhibitor alone in patients with advanced, surgically resected melanoma is under development. Trial Registration: NCT02301611.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101752446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101752446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-021-09709-1
DO - 10.1245/s10434-021-09709-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 33641012
AN - SCOPUS:85101752446
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 28
SP - 6126
EP - 6137
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -