A novel surgical technique for a rat subcutaneous implantation of a tissue engineered scaffold

Reza Khorramirouz, Jason L. Go, Christopher Noble, Soumen Jana, Eva Maxson, Amir Lerman, Melissa D Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Subcutaneous implantations in small animal models are currently required for preclinical studies of acellular tissue to evaluate biocompatibility, including host recellularization and immunogenic reactivity. Methods: Three rat subcutaneous implantation methods were evaluated in six Sprague Dawley rats. An acellular xenograft made from porcine pericardium was used as the tissue-scaffold. Three implantation methods were performed; 1) Suture method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted by suturing its border to the external oblique muscle, 2) Control method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted without any suturing or support, 3) Frame method is where a tissue-scaffold was attached to a circular frame composed of polycaprolactone (PCL) biomaterial and placed subcutaneously. After 1 and 4 weeks, tissue-scaffolds were explanted and evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome,Picrosirius Red, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemistry, and mechanical testing. Results: Macroscopically, tissue-scaffold degradation with the suture method and tissue-scaffold folding with the control method were observed after 4 weeks. In comparison, the frame method demonstrated intact tissue scaffolds after 4 weeks. H&E staining showed progressive cell repopulation over the course of the experiment in all groups with acute and chronic inflammation observed in suture and control methods throughout the duration of the study. Immunohistochemistry quantification of CD3, CD 31, CD 34, CD 163, and αSMA showed a statistically significant differences between the suture, control and frame methods (P < 0.05) at both time points. The average tensile strength was 4.03 ± 0.49, 7.45 ± 0.49 and 5.72 ± 1.34 (MPa) after 1 week and 0.55 ± 0.26, 0.12 ± 0.03 and 0.41 ± 0.32 (MPa) after 4 weeks in the suture, control, and frame methods; respectively. TEM analysis showed an increase in inflammatory cells in both suture and control methods following implantation. Conclusion: Rat subcutaneous implantation with the frame method was performed with success and ease. The surgical approach used for the frame technique was found to be the best methodology for in vivo evaluation of tissue engineered acellular scaffolds, where the frame method did not compromise mechanical strength, but it reduced inflammation significantly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalActa Histochemica
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Tissue Scaffolds
Sutures
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Immunohistochemistry
Inflammation
Tensile Strength
Pericardium
Biocompatible Materials
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)

Keywords

  • Acellular xenograft
  • Extracellular matrix
  • Histology
  • Inflammation
  • Mechanical behavior
  • Subcutaneous implantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Histology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

A novel surgical technique for a rat subcutaneous implantation of a tissue engineered scaffold. / Khorramirouz, Reza; Go, Jason L.; Noble, Christopher; Jana, Soumen; Maxson, Eva; Lerman, Amir; Young, Melissa D.

In: Acta Histochemica, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4a9040f435ca4b0794195167b3db5200,
title = "A novel surgical technique for a rat subcutaneous implantation of a tissue engineered scaffold",
abstract = "Objectives: Subcutaneous implantations in small animal models are currently required for preclinical studies of acellular tissue to evaluate biocompatibility, including host recellularization and immunogenic reactivity. Methods: Three rat subcutaneous implantation methods were evaluated in six Sprague Dawley rats. An acellular xenograft made from porcine pericardium was used as the tissue-scaffold. Three implantation methods were performed; 1) Suture method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted by suturing its border to the external oblique muscle, 2) Control method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted without any suturing or support, 3) Frame method is where a tissue-scaffold was attached to a circular frame composed of polycaprolactone (PCL) biomaterial and placed subcutaneously. After 1 and 4 weeks, tissue-scaffolds were explanted and evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome,Picrosirius Red, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemistry, and mechanical testing. Results: Macroscopically, tissue-scaffold degradation with the suture method and tissue-scaffold folding with the control method were observed after 4 weeks. In comparison, the frame method demonstrated intact tissue scaffolds after 4 weeks. H&E staining showed progressive cell repopulation over the course of the experiment in all groups with acute and chronic inflammation observed in suture and control methods throughout the duration of the study. Immunohistochemistry quantification of CD3, CD 31, CD 34, CD 163, and αSMA showed a statistically significant differences between the suture, control and frame methods (P < 0.05) at both time points. The average tensile strength was 4.03 ± 0.49, 7.45 ± 0.49 and 5.72 ± 1.34 (MPa) after 1 week and 0.55 ± 0.26, 0.12 ± 0.03 and 0.41 ± 0.32 (MPa) after 4 weeks in the suture, control, and frame methods; respectively. TEM analysis showed an increase in inflammatory cells in both suture and control methods following implantation. Conclusion: Rat subcutaneous implantation with the frame method was performed with success and ease. The surgical approach used for the frame technique was found to be the best methodology for in vivo evaluation of tissue engineered acellular scaffolds, where the frame method did not compromise mechanical strength, but it reduced inflammation significantly.",
keywords = "Acellular xenograft, Extracellular matrix, Histology, Inflammation, Mechanical behavior, Subcutaneous implantation",
author = "Reza Khorramirouz and Go, {Jason L.} and Christopher Noble and Soumen Jana and Eva Maxson and Amir Lerman and Young, {Melissa D}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acthis.2018.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Acta Histochemica",
issn = "0065-1281",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel surgical technique for a rat subcutaneous implantation of a tissue engineered scaffold

AU - Khorramirouz, Reza

AU - Go, Jason L.

AU - Noble, Christopher

AU - Jana, Soumen

AU - Maxson, Eva

AU - Lerman, Amir

AU - Young, Melissa D

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Subcutaneous implantations in small animal models are currently required for preclinical studies of acellular tissue to evaluate biocompatibility, including host recellularization and immunogenic reactivity. Methods: Three rat subcutaneous implantation methods were evaluated in six Sprague Dawley rats. An acellular xenograft made from porcine pericardium was used as the tissue-scaffold. Three implantation methods were performed; 1) Suture method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted by suturing its border to the external oblique muscle, 2) Control method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted without any suturing or support, 3) Frame method is where a tissue-scaffold was attached to a circular frame composed of polycaprolactone (PCL) biomaterial and placed subcutaneously. After 1 and 4 weeks, tissue-scaffolds were explanted and evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome,Picrosirius Red, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemistry, and mechanical testing. Results: Macroscopically, tissue-scaffold degradation with the suture method and tissue-scaffold folding with the control method were observed after 4 weeks. In comparison, the frame method demonstrated intact tissue scaffolds after 4 weeks. H&E staining showed progressive cell repopulation over the course of the experiment in all groups with acute and chronic inflammation observed in suture and control methods throughout the duration of the study. Immunohistochemistry quantification of CD3, CD 31, CD 34, CD 163, and αSMA showed a statistically significant differences between the suture, control and frame methods (P < 0.05) at both time points. The average tensile strength was 4.03 ± 0.49, 7.45 ± 0.49 and 5.72 ± 1.34 (MPa) after 1 week and 0.55 ± 0.26, 0.12 ± 0.03 and 0.41 ± 0.32 (MPa) after 4 weeks in the suture, control, and frame methods; respectively. TEM analysis showed an increase in inflammatory cells in both suture and control methods following implantation. Conclusion: Rat subcutaneous implantation with the frame method was performed with success and ease. The surgical approach used for the frame technique was found to be the best methodology for in vivo evaluation of tissue engineered acellular scaffolds, where the frame method did not compromise mechanical strength, but it reduced inflammation significantly.

AB - Objectives: Subcutaneous implantations in small animal models are currently required for preclinical studies of acellular tissue to evaluate biocompatibility, including host recellularization and immunogenic reactivity. Methods: Three rat subcutaneous implantation methods were evaluated in six Sprague Dawley rats. An acellular xenograft made from porcine pericardium was used as the tissue-scaffold. Three implantation methods were performed; 1) Suture method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted by suturing its border to the external oblique muscle, 2) Control method is where a tissue-scaffold was implanted without any suturing or support, 3) Frame method is where a tissue-scaffold was attached to a circular frame composed of polycaprolactone (PCL) biomaterial and placed subcutaneously. After 1 and 4 weeks, tissue-scaffolds were explanted and evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome,Picrosirius Red, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemistry, and mechanical testing. Results: Macroscopically, tissue-scaffold degradation with the suture method and tissue-scaffold folding with the control method were observed after 4 weeks. In comparison, the frame method demonstrated intact tissue scaffolds after 4 weeks. H&E staining showed progressive cell repopulation over the course of the experiment in all groups with acute and chronic inflammation observed in suture and control methods throughout the duration of the study. Immunohistochemistry quantification of CD3, CD 31, CD 34, CD 163, and αSMA showed a statistically significant differences between the suture, control and frame methods (P < 0.05) at both time points. The average tensile strength was 4.03 ± 0.49, 7.45 ± 0.49 and 5.72 ± 1.34 (MPa) after 1 week and 0.55 ± 0.26, 0.12 ± 0.03 and 0.41 ± 0.32 (MPa) after 4 weeks in the suture, control, and frame methods; respectively. TEM analysis showed an increase in inflammatory cells in both suture and control methods following implantation. Conclusion: Rat subcutaneous implantation with the frame method was performed with success and ease. The surgical approach used for the frame technique was found to be the best methodology for in vivo evaluation of tissue engineered acellular scaffolds, where the frame method did not compromise mechanical strength, but it reduced inflammation significantly.

KW - Acellular xenograft

KW - Extracellular matrix

KW - Histology

KW - Inflammation

KW - Mechanical behavior

KW - Subcutaneous implantation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042856518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042856518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.02.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 29519681

AN - SCOPUS:85042856518

JO - Acta Histochemica

JF - Acta Histochemica

SN - 0065-1281

ER -