A novel methodology to realistically monitor office occupant reactions and environmental conditions using a living lab

Anja Jamrozik, Christian Ramos, Jie Zhao, Joleen Bernau, Nicholas Clements, Tracee Vetting Wolf, Brent A Bauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Indoor environmental conditions, including acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions, can impact the experience of occupants. How should these conditions be combined to optimize indoor environments for occupants? Living labs, in which study participants occupy a simulated real-world environment for an extended period, offer a new way to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions. In a proof-of-concept study, we tested whether varying combinations of environmental conditions in a simulated open-office environment would affect the experience of its occupants. Six different environmental “scenes”–combinations of acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions—were varied weekly over 18 weeks. One scene had environmental conditions commonly found in offices, including participants’ previous office, and served as the baseline against which the other scenes were compared. We tested the effects of office environmental conditions on occupants’ satisfaction and workday experience in the environment. Further, we tested whether the influence of the environment would extend outside of the time spent at work to affect occupants’ feelings and health behaviors. Changes in office environmental conditions affected occupants’ environmental satisfaction and their workday experience. Outside of the office, environmental conditions affected people's feelings (e.g., happiness) and health behaviors (reported sleep problems). These findings demonstrate that living labs offer a powerful methodology to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions on occupants’ experience, both inside and outside the lab.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-199
Number of pages10
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume130
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2018

Fingerprint

environmental factors
Lighting
Acoustics
environmental conditions
Health
methodology
experience
health behavior
work environment
acoustics
sleep
Hot Temperature
office
happiness
Sleep
effect

Keywords

  • Acoustic comfort
  • Environmental satisfaction
  • Indoor environmental quality (IEQ)
  • Lighting comfort
  • Living labs
  • Occupant experience
  • Thermal comfort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

A novel methodology to realistically monitor office occupant reactions and environmental conditions using a living lab. / Jamrozik, Anja; Ramos, Christian; Zhao, Jie; Bernau, Joleen; Clements, Nicholas; Vetting Wolf, Tracee; Bauer, Brent A.

In: Building and Environment, Vol. 130, 15.02.2018, p. 190-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jamrozik, Anja ; Ramos, Christian ; Zhao, Jie ; Bernau, Joleen ; Clements, Nicholas ; Vetting Wolf, Tracee ; Bauer, Brent A. / A novel methodology to realistically monitor office occupant reactions and environmental conditions using a living lab. In: Building and Environment. 2018 ; Vol. 130. pp. 190-199.
@article{81c934aeda9143e785c57e0f91359149,
title = "A novel methodology to realistically monitor office occupant reactions and environmental conditions using a living lab",
abstract = "Indoor environmental conditions, including acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions, can impact the experience of occupants. How should these conditions be combined to optimize indoor environments for occupants? Living labs, in which study participants occupy a simulated real-world environment for an extended period, offer a new way to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions. In a proof-of-concept study, we tested whether varying combinations of environmental conditions in a simulated open-office environment would affect the experience of its occupants. Six different environmental “scenes”–combinations of acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions—were varied weekly over 18 weeks. One scene had environmental conditions commonly found in offices, including participants’ previous office, and served as the baseline against which the other scenes were compared. We tested the effects of office environmental conditions on occupants’ satisfaction and workday experience in the environment. Further, we tested whether the influence of the environment would extend outside of the time spent at work to affect occupants’ feelings and health behaviors. Changes in office environmental conditions affected occupants’ environmental satisfaction and their workday experience. Outside of the office, environmental conditions affected people's feelings (e.g., happiness) and health behaviors (reported sleep problems). These findings demonstrate that living labs offer a powerful methodology to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions on occupants’ experience, both inside and outside the lab.",
keywords = "Acoustic comfort, Environmental satisfaction, Indoor environmental quality (IEQ), Lighting comfort, Living labs, Occupant experience, Thermal comfort",
author = "Anja Jamrozik and Christian Ramos and Jie Zhao and Joleen Bernau and Nicholas Clements and {Vetting Wolf}, Tracee and Bauer, {Brent A}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "190--199",
journal = "Building and Environment",
issn = "0360-1323",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel methodology to realistically monitor office occupant reactions and environmental conditions using a living lab

AU - Jamrozik, Anja

AU - Ramos, Christian

AU - Zhao, Jie

AU - Bernau, Joleen

AU - Clements, Nicholas

AU - Vetting Wolf, Tracee

AU - Bauer, Brent A

PY - 2018/2/15

Y1 - 2018/2/15

N2 - Indoor environmental conditions, including acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions, can impact the experience of occupants. How should these conditions be combined to optimize indoor environments for occupants? Living labs, in which study participants occupy a simulated real-world environment for an extended period, offer a new way to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions. In a proof-of-concept study, we tested whether varying combinations of environmental conditions in a simulated open-office environment would affect the experience of its occupants. Six different environmental “scenes”–combinations of acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions—were varied weekly over 18 weeks. One scene had environmental conditions commonly found in offices, including participants’ previous office, and served as the baseline against which the other scenes were compared. We tested the effects of office environmental conditions on occupants’ satisfaction and workday experience in the environment. Further, we tested whether the influence of the environment would extend outside of the time spent at work to affect occupants’ feelings and health behaviors. Changes in office environmental conditions affected occupants’ environmental satisfaction and their workday experience. Outside of the office, environmental conditions affected people's feelings (e.g., happiness) and health behaviors (reported sleep problems). These findings demonstrate that living labs offer a powerful methodology to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions on occupants’ experience, both inside and outside the lab.

AB - Indoor environmental conditions, including acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions, can impact the experience of occupants. How should these conditions be combined to optimize indoor environments for occupants? Living labs, in which study participants occupy a simulated real-world environment for an extended period, offer a new way to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions. In a proof-of-concept study, we tested whether varying combinations of environmental conditions in a simulated open-office environment would affect the experience of its occupants. Six different environmental “scenes”–combinations of acoustic, lighting, and thermal conditions—were varied weekly over 18 weeks. One scene had environmental conditions commonly found in offices, including participants’ previous office, and served as the baseline against which the other scenes were compared. We tested the effects of office environmental conditions on occupants’ satisfaction and workday experience in the environment. Further, we tested whether the influence of the environment would extend outside of the time spent at work to affect occupants’ feelings and health behaviors. Changes in office environmental conditions affected occupants’ environmental satisfaction and their workday experience. Outside of the office, environmental conditions affected people's feelings (e.g., happiness) and health behaviors (reported sleep problems). These findings demonstrate that living labs offer a powerful methodology to test the interactive effects of environmental conditions on occupants’ experience, both inside and outside the lab.

KW - Acoustic comfort

KW - Environmental satisfaction

KW - Indoor environmental quality (IEQ)

KW - Lighting comfort

KW - Living labs

KW - Occupant experience

KW - Thermal comfort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044621949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044621949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.024

DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.024

M3 - Article

VL - 130

SP - 190

EP - 199

JO - Building and Environment

JF - Building and Environment

SN - 0360-1323

ER -