A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients

Matthew E. Nolan, Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba, Pablo Moreno-Franco, Brian W Pickering, Vitaly D Herasevich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The electronic chart review habits of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians admitting new patients are largely unknown but necessary to inform the design of existing and future critical care information systems.

METHODS: We conducted a survey study to assess the electronic chart review practices, information needs, workflow, and data display preferences among medical ICU clinicians admitting new patients. We surveyed rotating residents, critical care fellows, advanced practice providers, and attending physicians at three Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona) via email with a single follow-up reminder message.

RESULTS: Of 234 clinicians invited, 156 completed the full survey (67% response rate). Ninety-two percent of medical ICU clinicians performed electronic chart review for the majority of new patients. Clinicians estimated spending a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 15 (10-20) minutes for a typical case, and 25 (15-40) minutes for complex cases, with no difference across training levels. Chart review spans 3 or more years for two-thirds of clinicians, with the most relevant categories being imaging, laboratory studies, diagnostic studies, microbiology reports, and clinical notes, although most time is spent reviewing notes. Most clinicians (77%) worry about overlooking important information due to the volume of data (74%) and inadequate display/organization (63%). Potential solutions are chronologic ordering of disparate data types, color coding, and explicit data filtering techniques. The ability to dynamically customize information display for different users and varying clinical scenarios is paramount.

CONCLUSION: Electronic chart review of historical data is an important, prevalent, and potentially time-consuming activity among medical ICU clinicians who would benefit from improved information display systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1197-1207
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Data Display
Intensive care units
Habits
Intensive Care Units
Display devices
Critical Care
Information Systems
Aptitude
Workflow
Microbiology
Electronic mail
Color
Physicians
Information systems
Surveys and Questionnaires
Imaging techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients. / Nolan, Matthew E.; Cartin-Ceba, Rodrigo; Moreno-Franco, Pablo; Pickering, Brian W; Herasevich, Vitaly D.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.10.2017, p. 1197-1207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54e8c3fbc056443589e04201a5dc50c0,
title = "A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The electronic chart review habits of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians admitting new patients are largely unknown but necessary to inform the design of existing and future critical care information systems.METHODS: We conducted a survey study to assess the electronic chart review practices, information needs, workflow, and data display preferences among medical ICU clinicians admitting new patients. We surveyed rotating residents, critical care fellows, advanced practice providers, and attending physicians at three Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona) via email with a single follow-up reminder message.RESULTS: Of 234 clinicians invited, 156 completed the full survey (67{\%} response rate). Ninety-two percent of medical ICU clinicians performed electronic chart review for the majority of new patients. Clinicians estimated spending a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 15 (10-20) minutes for a typical case, and 25 (15-40) minutes for complex cases, with no difference across training levels. Chart review spans 3 or more years for two-thirds of clinicians, with the most relevant categories being imaging, laboratory studies, diagnostic studies, microbiology reports, and clinical notes, although most time is spent reviewing notes. Most clinicians (77{\%}) worry about overlooking important information due to the volume of data (74{\%}) and inadequate display/organization (63{\%}). Potential solutions are chronologic ordering of disparate data types, color coding, and explicit data filtering techniques. The ability to dynamically customize information display for different users and varying clinical scenarios is paramount.CONCLUSION: Electronic chart review of historical data is an important, prevalent, and potentially time-consuming activity among medical ICU clinicians who would benefit from improved information display systems.",
author = "Nolan, {Matthew E.} and Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba and Pablo Moreno-Franco and Pickering, {Brian W} and Herasevich, {Vitaly D}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4338/ACI-2017-04-RA-0060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "1197--1207",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multisite Survey Study of EMR Review Habits, Information Needs, and Display Preferences among Medical ICU Clinicians Evaluating New Patients

AU - Nolan, Matthew E.

AU - Cartin-Ceba, Rodrigo

AU - Moreno-Franco, Pablo

AU - Pickering, Brian W

AU - Herasevich, Vitaly D

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The electronic chart review habits of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians admitting new patients are largely unknown but necessary to inform the design of existing and future critical care information systems.METHODS: We conducted a survey study to assess the electronic chart review practices, information needs, workflow, and data display preferences among medical ICU clinicians admitting new patients. We surveyed rotating residents, critical care fellows, advanced practice providers, and attending physicians at three Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona) via email with a single follow-up reminder message.RESULTS: Of 234 clinicians invited, 156 completed the full survey (67% response rate). Ninety-two percent of medical ICU clinicians performed electronic chart review for the majority of new patients. Clinicians estimated spending a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 15 (10-20) minutes for a typical case, and 25 (15-40) minutes for complex cases, with no difference across training levels. Chart review spans 3 or more years for two-thirds of clinicians, with the most relevant categories being imaging, laboratory studies, diagnostic studies, microbiology reports, and clinical notes, although most time is spent reviewing notes. Most clinicians (77%) worry about overlooking important information due to the volume of data (74%) and inadequate display/organization (63%). Potential solutions are chronologic ordering of disparate data types, color coding, and explicit data filtering techniques. The ability to dynamically customize information display for different users and varying clinical scenarios is paramount.CONCLUSION: Electronic chart review of historical data is an important, prevalent, and potentially time-consuming activity among medical ICU clinicians who would benefit from improved information display systems.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The electronic chart review habits of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians admitting new patients are largely unknown but necessary to inform the design of existing and future critical care information systems.METHODS: We conducted a survey study to assess the electronic chart review practices, information needs, workflow, and data display preferences among medical ICU clinicians admitting new patients. We surveyed rotating residents, critical care fellows, advanced practice providers, and attending physicians at three Mayo Clinic sites (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona) via email with a single follow-up reminder message.RESULTS: Of 234 clinicians invited, 156 completed the full survey (67% response rate). Ninety-two percent of medical ICU clinicians performed electronic chart review for the majority of new patients. Clinicians estimated spending a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 15 (10-20) minutes for a typical case, and 25 (15-40) minutes for complex cases, with no difference across training levels. Chart review spans 3 or more years for two-thirds of clinicians, with the most relevant categories being imaging, laboratory studies, diagnostic studies, microbiology reports, and clinical notes, although most time is spent reviewing notes. Most clinicians (77%) worry about overlooking important information due to the volume of data (74%) and inadequate display/organization (63%). Potential solutions are chronologic ordering of disparate data types, color coding, and explicit data filtering techniques. The ability to dynamically customize information display for different users and varying clinical scenarios is paramount.CONCLUSION: Electronic chart review of historical data is an important, prevalent, and potentially time-consuming activity among medical ICU clinicians who would benefit from improved information display systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052576422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052576422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2017-04-RA-0060

DO - 10.4338/ACI-2017-04-RA-0060

M3 - Article

C2 - 29272901

AN - SCOPUS:85052576422

VL - 8

SP - 1197

EP - 1207

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 4

ER -