A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions

David Holmes, Eric J. Topol, Robert M. Califf, Lisa G. Berdan, Ferdinand Leya, Peter B. Berger, Patrick L. Whitlow, Robert D. Safian, Allan G. Adelman, Mirle A. Kellett, J. David Talley, Jacob Shani, Ronald S. Gottlieb, Cass A. Pinkerton, Kerry L. Lee, Gordon P. Keeler, Stephen G. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

181 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Directional coronary atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty have both been used in symptomatic patients with coronary saphenous vein bypass graft stenoses. The relative merits of plaque excision and removal versus balloon dilatation remain uncertain. We compared outcomes after directional coronary atherectomy or angioplasty in patients with de nova bypass graft stenoses. Methods and Results: Fifty-four North American and European sites randomized 305 patients with de nova vein graft lesions to atherectomy (n=149) or angioplasty (n=156). Quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory assessed initial and 6-month results. Initial angiographic success was greater with atherectomy (89.2% versus 79.0%), as was initial luminal gain (1.45 versus 1.12 mm, P<.001). Distal embolization was increased with atherectomy (P=.012), and a trend was shown toward more non-Q-wave myocardial infarction(P=.09). Although the 6-month net minimum luminal diameter gain was 0.68 mm for atherectomy and 0.50 mm for angioplasty, the restenosis rates were similar, 45.6% for atherectomy and 50.5% for angioplasty (P=.491). At 6 months, there was a trend toward decreased repeated target-vessel interventions for atherectomy (P=.092); in addition, 13.2% of patients treated with atherectomy versus 22.4% of the angioplasty patients (P=.041) required repeated percutaneous intervention of the initial target lesion. Conclusions: Atherectomy of de nova vein graft lesions was associated with improved initial angiographic success and luminal diameter but also with increased distal embolization. There was no difference in 6-month restenosis rates, although primary atherectomy patients tended to require fewer target-vessel revascularization procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1966-1974
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation
Volume91
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1995

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • angioplasty
  • revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Holmes, D., Topol, E. J., Califf, R. M., Berdan, L. G., Leya, F., Berger, P. B., Whitlow, P. L., Safian, R. D., Adelman, A. G., Kellett, M. A., Talley, J. D., Shani, J., Gottlieb, R. S., Pinkerton, C. A., Lee, K. L., Keeler, G. P., & Ellis, S. G. (1995). A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. Circulation, 91(7), 1966-1974. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.91.7.1966