A method for accounting for test fixture compliance when estimating proximal femur stiffness

Timothy Rossman, M. (Dan) Dragomir Daescu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Fracture testing of cadaveric femora to obtain strength and stiffness information is an active area of research in developing tools for diagnostic prediction of bone strength. These measurements are often used in the estimation and validation of companion finite element models constructed from the femora CT scan data, therefore, the accuracy of the data is of paramount importance. However, experimental stiffness calculated from force–displacement data has largely been ignored by most researchers due to inherent error in the differential displacement measurement obtained when not accounting for testing apparatus compliance. However, having such information is necessary for validation of computational models. Even in the few cases when fixture compliance was considered the measurements showed large lab-to-lab variation due to lack of standardization in fixture design. We examined the compliance of our in-house designed cadaveric femur test fixture to determine the errors we could expect when calculating stiffness from the collected experimental force–displacement data and determined the stiffness of the test fixture to be more than 10 times the stiffness of the stiffest femur in a sample of 44 femora. When correcting the apparent femur stiffness derived from the original data, we found that the largest stiffness was underestimated by about 10%. The study confirmed that considering test fixture compliance is a necessary step in improving the accuracy of fracture test data for characterizing femur stiffness, and highlighted the need for test fixture design standardization for proximal femur fracture testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3101-3105
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume49
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 6 2016

Fingerprint

Femur
Compliance
Stiffness
Fracture testing
Standardization
Displacement measurement
Computerized tomography
Bone
Research Personnel
Bone and Bones
Testing
Research

Keywords

  • Femur fracture
  • Fixture compliance
  • Measurements
  • QCT/FEA
  • Stiffness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

A method for accounting for test fixture compliance when estimating proximal femur stiffness. / Rossman, Timothy; Dragomir Daescu, M. (Dan).

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 49, No. 13, 06.09.2016, p. 3101-3105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b2f09aa37694ac9889a849340152fcd,
title = "A method for accounting for test fixture compliance when estimating proximal femur stiffness",
abstract = "Fracture testing of cadaveric femora to obtain strength and stiffness information is an active area of research in developing tools for diagnostic prediction of bone strength. These measurements are often used in the estimation and validation of companion finite element models constructed from the femora CT scan data, therefore, the accuracy of the data is of paramount importance. However, experimental stiffness calculated from force–displacement data has largely been ignored by most researchers due to inherent error in the differential displacement measurement obtained when not accounting for testing apparatus compliance. However, having such information is necessary for validation of computational models. Even in the few cases when fixture compliance was considered the measurements showed large lab-to-lab variation due to lack of standardization in fixture design. We examined the compliance of our in-house designed cadaveric femur test fixture to determine the errors we could expect when calculating stiffness from the collected experimental force–displacement data and determined the stiffness of the test fixture to be more than 10 times the stiffness of the stiffest femur in a sample of 44 femora. When correcting the apparent femur stiffness derived from the original data, we found that the largest stiffness was underestimated by about 10{\%}. The study confirmed that considering test fixture compliance is a necessary step in improving the accuracy of fracture test data for characterizing femur stiffness, and highlighted the need for test fixture design standardization for proximal femur fracture testing.",
keywords = "Femur fracture, Fixture compliance, Measurements, QCT/FEA, Stiffness",
author = "Timothy Rossman and {Dragomir Daescu}, {M. (Dan)}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "3101--3105",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for accounting for test fixture compliance when estimating proximal femur stiffness

AU - Rossman, Timothy

AU - Dragomir Daescu, M. (Dan)

PY - 2016/9/6

Y1 - 2016/9/6

N2 - Fracture testing of cadaveric femora to obtain strength and stiffness information is an active area of research in developing tools for diagnostic prediction of bone strength. These measurements are often used in the estimation and validation of companion finite element models constructed from the femora CT scan data, therefore, the accuracy of the data is of paramount importance. However, experimental stiffness calculated from force–displacement data has largely been ignored by most researchers due to inherent error in the differential displacement measurement obtained when not accounting for testing apparatus compliance. However, having such information is necessary for validation of computational models. Even in the few cases when fixture compliance was considered the measurements showed large lab-to-lab variation due to lack of standardization in fixture design. We examined the compliance of our in-house designed cadaveric femur test fixture to determine the errors we could expect when calculating stiffness from the collected experimental force–displacement data and determined the stiffness of the test fixture to be more than 10 times the stiffness of the stiffest femur in a sample of 44 femora. When correcting the apparent femur stiffness derived from the original data, we found that the largest stiffness was underestimated by about 10%. The study confirmed that considering test fixture compliance is a necessary step in improving the accuracy of fracture test data for characterizing femur stiffness, and highlighted the need for test fixture design standardization for proximal femur fracture testing.

AB - Fracture testing of cadaveric femora to obtain strength and stiffness information is an active area of research in developing tools for diagnostic prediction of bone strength. These measurements are often used in the estimation and validation of companion finite element models constructed from the femora CT scan data, therefore, the accuracy of the data is of paramount importance. However, experimental stiffness calculated from force–displacement data has largely been ignored by most researchers due to inherent error in the differential displacement measurement obtained when not accounting for testing apparatus compliance. However, having such information is necessary for validation of computational models. Even in the few cases when fixture compliance was considered the measurements showed large lab-to-lab variation due to lack of standardization in fixture design. We examined the compliance of our in-house designed cadaveric femur test fixture to determine the errors we could expect when calculating stiffness from the collected experimental force–displacement data and determined the stiffness of the test fixture to be more than 10 times the stiffness of the stiffest femur in a sample of 44 femora. When correcting the apparent femur stiffness derived from the original data, we found that the largest stiffness was underestimated by about 10%. The study confirmed that considering test fixture compliance is a necessary step in improving the accuracy of fracture test data for characterizing femur stiffness, and highlighted the need for test fixture design standardization for proximal femur fracture testing.

KW - Femur fracture

KW - Fixture compliance

KW - Measurements

KW - QCT/FEA

KW - Stiffness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994381538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994381538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.026

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.026

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 3101

EP - 3105

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 13

ER -