TY - JOUR
T1 - A Lesson from Cardiology
T2 - The Argument for Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Artery Access in Interventional Neuroradiology
AU - Sorenson, Thomas J.
AU - Nicholson, Patrick J.
AU - Hilditch, Christopher A.
AU - Murad, Mohammad H.
AU - Brinjikji, Waleed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Purpose: The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US–guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Results: Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non–US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.41–37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.49–5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications. Conclusions: US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.
AB - Purpose: The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US–guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Results: Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non–US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.41–37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.49–5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications. Conclusions: US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.
KW - Endovascular
KW - Interventional neuroradiology
KW - Neurointerventionalist
KW - Transfemoral
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063423704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063423704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.171
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.171
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30862603
AN - SCOPUS:85063423704
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 126
SP - 124
EP - 128
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -