A Lesson from Cardiology: The Argument for Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Artery Access in Interventional Neuroradiology

Thomas J. Sorenson, Patrick J. Nicholson, Christopher A. Hilditch, Mohammad H Murad, Waleed Brinjikji

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US–guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Results: Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non–US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.41–37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.49–5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications. Conclusions: US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-128
Number of pages5
JournalWorld neurosurgery
Volume126
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Femoral Artery
Cardiology
Endovascular Procedures
Ultrasonography
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Thigh
Blood Vessels
Anatomy
MEDLINE
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Endovascular
  • Interventional neuroradiology
  • Neurointerventionalist
  • Transfemoral
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A Lesson from Cardiology : The Argument for Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Artery Access in Interventional Neuroradiology. / Sorenson, Thomas J.; Nicholson, Patrick J.; Hilditch, Christopher A.; Murad, Mohammad H; Brinjikji, Waleed.

In: World neurosurgery, Vol. 126, 01.06.2019, p. 124-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{726086485399468c87c7b119de255a37,
title = "A Lesson from Cardiology: The Argument for Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Artery Access in Interventional Neuroradiology",
abstract = "Purpose: The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US–guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Results: Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non–US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 12.41–37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95{\%} CI 1.49–5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95{\%} CI 0.23–0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications. Conclusions: US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.",
keywords = "Endovascular, Interventional neuroradiology, Neurointerventionalist, Transfemoral, Ultrasound",
author = "Sorenson, {Thomas J.} and Nicholson, {Patrick J.} and Hilditch, {Christopher A.} and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Waleed Brinjikji",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "124--128",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Lesson from Cardiology

T2 - The Argument for Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Artery Access in Interventional Neuroradiology

AU - Sorenson, Thomas J.

AU - Nicholson, Patrick J.

AU - Hilditch, Christopher A.

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Brinjikji, Waleed

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Purpose: The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US–guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Results: Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non–US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.41–37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.49–5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications. Conclusions: US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.

AB - Purpose: The transfemoral approach is widely used by neurointerventionalists for accessing the femoral artery in patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular procedures. In patients with more difficult anatomy, duplex ultrasonography (US) may be a valuable adjunct for femoral vascular access. We aimed to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of duplex US–guided femoral access within interventional neuroradiology. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE and included 5 randomized controlled trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Results: Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs that included 784 US-guided patients and 769 non–US-guided patients found that the US-guided approach was significantly favored in terms of time-to-access (weighted mean difference: 24.90 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.41–37.38), first-pass success rate (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.49–5.92), and total complication rate (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.77). There were no statistically significant differences in technical success rate, number of attempts, or individual complications. Conclusions: US-guided femoral artery access for endovascular procedures is a safe and effective adjunct for visualizing the femoral artery during vascular access for endovascular procedures. Neurointerventionalists should consider a low threshold for its use, especially for patients with challenging anatomy or at high-risk of bleeding complications.

KW - Endovascular

KW - Interventional neuroradiology

KW - Neurointerventionalist

KW - Transfemoral

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063423704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063423704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.171

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.171

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30862603

AN - SCOPUS:85063423704

VL - 126

SP - 124

EP - 128

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

ER -