A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care

Ken Catchpole, Eric Ley, Doug Wiegmann, Jennifer Blaha, Daniel Shouhed, Alexandra Gangi, Renaldo Blocker, Richard Karl, Cathy Karl, Bill Taggart, Benjamin Starnes, Bruce Gewertz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE A physician-centered approach to systems design is fundamental to ameliorating the causes of many errors, inefficiencies, and reliability problems.

OBJECTIVE To use human factors engineering to redesign the trauma process based on previously identified impediments to care related to coordination problems, communication failures, and equipment issues.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study used an interrupted time series design to collect historically controlled data via prospective direct observation by trained observers. We studied patients from a level I trauma center from August 1 through October 31, 2011, and August 1 through October 31, 2012.

INTERVENTIONS A range of potential solutions based on previous observations, trauma team engagement, and iterative cycles identified the most promising subsystem interventions (headsets, equipment storage, medication packs, whiteboard, prebriefing, and teamwork training). Five of the 6 subsystem interventions were successfully deployed. Communication headsets were found to be unsuitable in simulation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measurewas flowdisruptions, with treatment time and length of stay as secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS A total of 86 patients were observed before the intervention and 120 after the intervention. Flow disruptions increased if the patient had undergone computed tomography (CT) (F1200= 20.0, P <.001) and had been to the operating room (F1200= 63.1, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 6.50, P =.01). For total treatment time, there was an effect of the intervention (F1200= 21.7, P <.001), whether the patient had undergone CT (F1200= 43.0, P <.001), and whether the patient had been to the operating room (F1200= 85.8, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 15.1, P <.001), reflecting a 20-to 30-minute reduction in time in the emergency department. Length of stay was reduced significantly for patients with major mortality risk (P =.01) from a median of 8 to 5 days.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Deployment of complex subsystem interventions based on detailed human factors engineering and a systems analysis of the provision of trauma care resulted in reduced flow disruptions, treatment time, and length of stay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)962-968
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume149
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Tomography
Length of Stay
Human Engineering
Operating Rooms
Communication
Equipment Failure
Trauma Centers
Systems Analysis
Hospital Emergency Service
Therapeutics
Observation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Catchpole, K., Ley, E., Wiegmann, D., Blaha, J., Shouhed, D., Gangi, A., ... Gewertz, B. (2014). A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care. JAMA Surgery, 149(9), 962-968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1208

A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care. / Catchpole, Ken; Ley, Eric; Wiegmann, Doug; Blaha, Jennifer; Shouhed, Daniel; Gangi, Alexandra; Blocker, Renaldo; Karl, Richard; Karl, Cathy; Taggart, Bill; Starnes, Benjamin; Gewertz, Bruce.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 149, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 962-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Catchpole, K, Ley, E, Wiegmann, D, Blaha, J, Shouhed, D, Gangi, A, Blocker, R, Karl, R, Karl, C, Taggart, B, Starnes, B & Gewertz, B 2014, 'A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care', JAMA Surgery, vol. 149, no. 9, pp. 962-968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1208
Catchpole K, Ley E, Wiegmann D, Blaha J, Shouhed D, Gangi A et al. A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care. JAMA Surgery. 2014 Jan 1;149(9):962-968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1208
Catchpole, Ken ; Ley, Eric ; Wiegmann, Doug ; Blaha, Jennifer ; Shouhed, Daniel ; Gangi, Alexandra ; Blocker, Renaldo ; Karl, Richard ; Karl, Cathy ; Taggart, Bill ; Starnes, Benjamin ; Gewertz, Bruce. / A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care. In: JAMA Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 149, No. 9. pp. 962-968.
@article{9d0d4036c10b4323a58fce0ae7680348,
title = "A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE A physician-centered approach to systems design is fundamental to ameliorating the causes of many errors, inefficiencies, and reliability problems.OBJECTIVE To use human factors engineering to redesign the trauma process based on previously identified impediments to care related to coordination problems, communication failures, and equipment issues.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study used an interrupted time series design to collect historically controlled data via prospective direct observation by trained observers. We studied patients from a level I trauma center from August 1 through October 31, 2011, and August 1 through October 31, 2012.INTERVENTIONS A range of potential solutions based on previous observations, trauma team engagement, and iterative cycles identified the most promising subsystem interventions (headsets, equipment storage, medication packs, whiteboard, prebriefing, and teamwork training). Five of the 6 subsystem interventions were successfully deployed. Communication headsets were found to be unsuitable in simulation.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measurewas flowdisruptions, with treatment time and length of stay as secondary outcome measures.RESULTS A total of 86 patients were observed before the intervention and 120 after the intervention. Flow disruptions increased if the patient had undergone computed tomography (CT) (F1200= 20.0, P <.001) and had been to the operating room (F1200= 63.1, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 6.50, P =.01). For total treatment time, there was an effect of the intervention (F1200= 21.7, P <.001), whether the patient had undergone CT (F1200= 43.0, P <.001), and whether the patient had been to the operating room (F1200= 85.8, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 15.1, P <.001), reflecting a 20-to 30-minute reduction in time in the emergency department. Length of stay was reduced significantly for patients with major mortality risk (P =.01) from a median of 8 to 5 days.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Deployment of complex subsystem interventions based on detailed human factors engineering and a systems analysis of the provision of trauma care resulted in reduced flow disruptions, treatment time, and length of stay.",
author = "Ken Catchpole and Eric Ley and Doug Wiegmann and Jennifer Blaha and Daniel Shouhed and Alexandra Gangi and Renaldo Blocker and Richard Karl and Cathy Karl and Bill Taggart and Benjamin Starnes and Bruce Gewertz",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "962--968",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A human factors subsystems approach to trauma care

AU - Catchpole, Ken

AU - Ley, Eric

AU - Wiegmann, Doug

AU - Blaha, Jennifer

AU - Shouhed, Daniel

AU - Gangi, Alexandra

AU - Blocker, Renaldo

AU - Karl, Richard

AU - Karl, Cathy

AU - Taggart, Bill

AU - Starnes, Benjamin

AU - Gewertz, Bruce

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE A physician-centered approach to systems design is fundamental to ameliorating the causes of many errors, inefficiencies, and reliability problems.OBJECTIVE To use human factors engineering to redesign the trauma process based on previously identified impediments to care related to coordination problems, communication failures, and equipment issues.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study used an interrupted time series design to collect historically controlled data via prospective direct observation by trained observers. We studied patients from a level I trauma center from August 1 through October 31, 2011, and August 1 through October 31, 2012.INTERVENTIONS A range of potential solutions based on previous observations, trauma team engagement, and iterative cycles identified the most promising subsystem interventions (headsets, equipment storage, medication packs, whiteboard, prebriefing, and teamwork training). Five of the 6 subsystem interventions were successfully deployed. Communication headsets were found to be unsuitable in simulation.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measurewas flowdisruptions, with treatment time and length of stay as secondary outcome measures.RESULTS A total of 86 patients were observed before the intervention and 120 after the intervention. Flow disruptions increased if the patient had undergone computed tomography (CT) (F1200= 20.0, P <.001) and had been to the operating room (F1200= 63.1, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 6.50, P =.01). For total treatment time, there was an effect of the intervention (F1200= 21.7, P <.001), whether the patient had undergone CT (F1200= 43.0, P <.001), and whether the patient had been to the operating room (F1200= 85.8, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 15.1, P <.001), reflecting a 20-to 30-minute reduction in time in the emergency department. Length of stay was reduced significantly for patients with major mortality risk (P =.01) from a median of 8 to 5 days.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Deployment of complex subsystem interventions based on detailed human factors engineering and a systems analysis of the provision of trauma care resulted in reduced flow disruptions, treatment time, and length of stay.

AB - IMPORTANCE A physician-centered approach to systems design is fundamental to ameliorating the causes of many errors, inefficiencies, and reliability problems.OBJECTIVE To use human factors engineering to redesign the trauma process based on previously identified impediments to care related to coordination problems, communication failures, and equipment issues.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study used an interrupted time series design to collect historically controlled data via prospective direct observation by trained observers. We studied patients from a level I trauma center from August 1 through October 31, 2011, and August 1 through October 31, 2012.INTERVENTIONS A range of potential solutions based on previous observations, trauma team engagement, and iterative cycles identified the most promising subsystem interventions (headsets, equipment storage, medication packs, whiteboard, prebriefing, and teamwork training). Five of the 6 subsystem interventions were successfully deployed. Communication headsets were found to be unsuitable in simulation.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measurewas flowdisruptions, with treatment time and length of stay as secondary outcome measures.RESULTS A total of 86 patients were observed before the intervention and 120 after the intervention. Flow disruptions increased if the patient had undergone computed tomography (CT) (F1200= 20.0, P <.001) and had been to the operating room (F1200= 63.1, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 6.50, P =.01). For total treatment time, there was an effect of the intervention (F1200= 21.7, P <.001), whether the patient had undergone CT (F1200= 43.0, P <.001), and whether the patient had been to the operating room (F1200= 85.8, P <.001), with an interaction among the intervention, trauma level, and CT (F1200= 15.1, P <.001), reflecting a 20-to 30-minute reduction in time in the emergency department. Length of stay was reduced significantly for patients with major mortality risk (P =.01) from a median of 8 to 5 days.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Deployment of complex subsystem interventions based on detailed human factors engineering and a systems analysis of the provision of trauma care resulted in reduced flow disruptions, treatment time, and length of stay.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907210932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907210932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1208

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1208

M3 - Article

VL - 149

SP - 962

EP - 968

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -