A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women

Franceska Dedeurwaerdere, Caterina Giannini, Raf Sciot, Brian P. Rubin, Giorgio Perilongo, Laura Borghi, Maria Luisa Ballotta, Erwin Cornips, Anouk Demunter, Brigitte Maes, Angelo P. Dei Tos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the ability of four peripheral bone measurement sites to predict low bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip as defined by the WHO classification, and to evaluate their role as a screening procedure for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). One thousand three hundred white women patients aged 58.3±13.9 years were enrolled. Correlations between the peripheral and central sites were moderate, varying between 0.51 and 0.67. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the curve for the peripheral sites revealed a few small, but significant, differences between sites. The optimal cut-point was derived from the ROC data for each site to assess its value as a screening parameter. These proved to be unsatisfactory, because the average number of false positives and false negatives were 18% and 24%, respectively. A proposal is made which entails two cut-points, one for an acceptable percentage of false negatives and the other for an acceptable number of false positives. Patients with t-scores between these cut-points would be referred for central DXA for classification. The result is a substantial decrease in the number of false negatives, i.e., patients who would be candidates for treatment. The contentious issue is what proportion of supplemental DXAs is considered logistically and economically acceptable for any of the peripheral site measurements to be useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-333
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Metabolic Bone Diseases
Osteoporosis
Photon Absorptiometry
Bone and Bones
ROC Curve
Femur Neck
Bone Density
Area Under Curve
Hip
Spine
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women. / Dedeurwaerdere, Franceska; Giannini, Caterina; Sciot, Raf; Rubin, Brian P.; Perilongo, Giorgio; Borghi, Laura; Ballotta, Maria Luisa; Cornips, Erwin; Demunter, Anouk; Maes, Brigitte; Dei Tos, Angelo P.

In: International Orthopaedics, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2002, p. 328-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dedeurwaerdere, F, Giannini, C, Sciot, R, Rubin, BP, Perilongo, G, Borghi, L, Ballotta, ML, Cornips, E, Demunter, A, Maes, B & Dei Tos, AP 2002, 'A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women', International Orthopaedics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 328-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-002-0382-0
Dedeurwaerdere, Franceska ; Giannini, Caterina ; Sciot, Raf ; Rubin, Brian P. ; Perilongo, Giorgio ; Borghi, Laura ; Ballotta, Maria Luisa ; Cornips, Erwin ; Demunter, Anouk ; Maes, Brigitte ; Dei Tos, Angelo P. / A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women. In: International Orthopaedics. 2002 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 328-333.
@article{4eb8ede4dbc843ecbc861e1fa8891ddd,
title = "A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to assess the ability of four peripheral bone measurement sites to predict low bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip as defined by the WHO classification, and to evaluate their role as a screening procedure for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). One thousand three hundred white women patients aged 58.3±13.9 years were enrolled. Correlations between the peripheral and central sites were moderate, varying between 0.51 and 0.67. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the curve for the peripheral sites revealed a few small, but significant, differences between sites. The optimal cut-point was derived from the ROC data for each site to assess its value as a screening parameter. These proved to be unsatisfactory, because the average number of false positives and false negatives were 18{\%} and 24{\%}, respectively. A proposal is made which entails two cut-points, one for an acceptable percentage of false negatives and the other for an acceptable number of false positives. Patients with t-scores between these cut-points would be referred for central DXA for classification. The result is a substantial decrease in the number of false negatives, i.e., patients who would be candidates for treatment. The contentious issue is what proportion of supplemental DXAs is considered logistically and economically acceptable for any of the peripheral site measurements to be useful.",
author = "Franceska Dedeurwaerdere and Caterina Giannini and Raf Sciot and Rubin, {Brian P.} and Giorgio Perilongo and Laura Borghi and Ballotta, {Maria Luisa} and Erwin Cornips and Anouk Demunter and Brigitte Maes and {Dei Tos}, {Angelo P.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1007/s00264-002-0382-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "328--333",
journal = "International Orthopaedics",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A crossover comparison of four peripheral bone-site measurements to identify central osteopenia and osteoporosis in women

AU - Dedeurwaerdere, Franceska

AU - Giannini, Caterina

AU - Sciot, Raf

AU - Rubin, Brian P.

AU - Perilongo, Giorgio

AU - Borghi, Laura

AU - Ballotta, Maria Luisa

AU - Cornips, Erwin

AU - Demunter, Anouk

AU - Maes, Brigitte

AU - Dei Tos, Angelo P.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The objective of this study was to assess the ability of four peripheral bone measurement sites to predict low bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip as defined by the WHO classification, and to evaluate their role as a screening procedure for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). One thousand three hundred white women patients aged 58.3±13.9 years were enrolled. Correlations between the peripheral and central sites were moderate, varying between 0.51 and 0.67. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the curve for the peripheral sites revealed a few small, but significant, differences between sites. The optimal cut-point was derived from the ROC data for each site to assess its value as a screening parameter. These proved to be unsatisfactory, because the average number of false positives and false negatives were 18% and 24%, respectively. A proposal is made which entails two cut-points, one for an acceptable percentage of false negatives and the other for an acceptable number of false positives. Patients with t-scores between these cut-points would be referred for central DXA for classification. The result is a substantial decrease in the number of false negatives, i.e., patients who would be candidates for treatment. The contentious issue is what proportion of supplemental DXAs is considered logistically and economically acceptable for any of the peripheral site measurements to be useful.

AB - The objective of this study was to assess the ability of four peripheral bone measurement sites to predict low bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip as defined by the WHO classification, and to evaluate their role as a screening procedure for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). One thousand three hundred white women patients aged 58.3±13.9 years were enrolled. Correlations between the peripheral and central sites were moderate, varying between 0.51 and 0.67. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the curve for the peripheral sites revealed a few small, but significant, differences between sites. The optimal cut-point was derived from the ROC data for each site to assess its value as a screening parameter. These proved to be unsatisfactory, because the average number of false positives and false negatives were 18% and 24%, respectively. A proposal is made which entails two cut-points, one for an acceptable percentage of false negatives and the other for an acceptable number of false positives. Patients with t-scores between these cut-points would be referred for central DXA for classification. The result is a substantial decrease in the number of false negatives, i.e., patients who would be candidates for treatment. The contentious issue is what proportion of supplemental DXAs is considered logistically and economically acceptable for any of the peripheral site measurements to be useful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036943810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036943810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-002-0382-0

DO - 10.1007/s00264-002-0382-0

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 328

EP - 333

JO - International Orthopaedics

JF - International Orthopaedics

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 6

ER -