TY - JOUR
T1 - A cost effective method of identifying and recruiting persons over 80 free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment
AU - Graff-Radford, Neill R.
AU - Ferman, Tanis J.
AU - Lucas, John A.
AU - Johnson, Heather K.
AU - Parfitt, Francine C.
AU - Heckman, Michael G.
AU - Todd, Murray
AU - Sadowsky, Carl
AU - Epstein, Dawn E.
AU - Crook, Julia E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - For observational or prevention studies, accurately identifying by mail and telephone cognitively normal elderly volunteers would be cost effective. We describe how to recruit cognitively normal sib-pairs over age 80 using commercially available lists by age and ZIP code. We mailed an Institutional Review Board-approved letter to 24,366 persons over 85 around Jacksonville, FL, and received ∼3000 postcard replies with ∼500 answering 3 screening statements affirmatively. Of these, we recruited 128 persons who underwent both in-person and telephone evaluations, the latter using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Blinded to the TICS-m and CDR data, clinicians made a consensus diagnosis for each participant, 120 were normal and 8 had mild cognitive impairment. With CDR, 119 patients (93%) screened as normal, and of these 115 (97%) were confirmed as normal with the consensus diagnosis. A TICS-m score cut-off of <29 resulted in a similar proportion of normals in the screened sample (97% or 103/106); however, 13 normal volunteers would have been excluded because they scored <29 on the TICS-m. Supplementing the sample, we recruited 12 age-matched cases having consensus diagnosis of dementia (n=2) or mild cognitive impairment (n=10). A CDR>0 correctly identified 12/12, whereas the TICS-m <29 correctly identified 7/12. Hearing loss present in 50% did not influence TICS-m or CDR performance. Using stringent entry criteria and the telephone CDR, this method accurately identified normal elderly persons.
AB - For observational or prevention studies, accurately identifying by mail and telephone cognitively normal elderly volunteers would be cost effective. We describe how to recruit cognitively normal sib-pairs over age 80 using commercially available lists by age and ZIP code. We mailed an Institutional Review Board-approved letter to 24,366 persons over 85 around Jacksonville, FL, and received ∼3000 postcard replies with ∼500 answering 3 screening statements affirmatively. Of these, we recruited 128 persons who underwent both in-person and telephone evaluations, the latter using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Blinded to the TICS-m and CDR data, clinicians made a consensus diagnosis for each participant, 120 were normal and 8 had mild cognitive impairment. With CDR, 119 patients (93%) screened as normal, and of these 115 (97%) were confirmed as normal with the consensus diagnosis. A TICS-m score cut-off of <29 resulted in a similar proportion of normals in the screened sample (97% or 103/106); however, 13 normal volunteers would have been excluded because they scored <29 on the TICS-m. Supplementing the sample, we recruited 12 age-matched cases having consensus diagnosis of dementia (n=2) or mild cognitive impairment (n=10). A CDR>0 correctly identified 12/12, whereas the TICS-m <29 correctly identified 7/12. Hearing loss present in 50% did not influence TICS-m or CDR performance. Using stringent entry criteria and the telephone CDR, this method accurately identified normal elderly persons.
KW - Clinical dementia rating scale
KW - Cognitively normal elderly
KW - Telephone evaluation
KW - Telephone interview cognitive status-modified
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748120163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748120163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.wad.0000213813.35424.d2
DO - 10.1097/01.wad.0000213813.35424.d2
M3 - Article
C2 - 16772745
AN - SCOPUS:33748120163
SN - 0893-0341
VL - 20
SP - 101
EP - 104
JO - Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders
JF - Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders
IS - 2
ER -