A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders

Kenneth A. Kobak, Leslie V H Taylor, Susan L. Dottl, John H. Greist, James W. Jefferson, Diane Burroughs, Julie M. Mantle, David J Katzelnick, Randal Norton, Henry J. Henk, Ronald C. Serlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

206 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context - Common mental disorders are often not identified in primary care settings. Objective - To evaluate the validity and clinical utility of a telephone-assisted computer-administered version of Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), a brief questionnaire and interview instrument designed to identify psychiatric disorders in primary care patients. Design - Comparison of diagnoses obtained by computer over the telephone using interactive voice response (IVR) technology vs those obtained by a trained clinician over the telephone using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition] Diagnosis (SCID). A subsample also received the clinician- administered version of PRIME-MD. Patients - Outpatients (N=200) from 4 primary care clinics, an eating disorders clinic, an alcohol treatment facility, psychiatric outpatients, and community controls. Setting - Interviews conducted by telephone, except for face-to-face administration of PRIME-MD, which was conducted at either the primary care clinic or a research clinic. Measurements and Main Results - Prevalence rates for any psychiatric disorder were similar between diagnoses made by the computer and those made by a mental health professional using the SCID (60.0% vs 58.5%). Prevalence rates for individual diagnoses were generally similar across versions. However, primary care patients reported twice as much alcohol abuse on the computer (15.0%) as on either the SCID (7.5%) or the clinician-administered PRIME-MD (7.5%). Using the SCID as the criterion, both the computer- and clinician-administered versions of PRIME-MD demonstrated high and roughly equivalent levels of sensitivity and specificity. Overall agreement (κ) for any diagnosis was 0.67 for the computer-administered PRIME-MD and 0.70 for the clinician-administered PRIME-MD. Conclusions - The computer-administered PRIME-MD appears to be a valid instrument for assessing psychopathology in primary care patients. Interactive voice response technology allows for increased availability, and provides primary care physicians with information that will increase the quality of patient care without additional physician time and at minimal expense.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)905-910
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume278
Issue number11
StatePublished - Sep 17 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mental Disorders
Primary Health Care
Interviews
Telephone
Psychiatry
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Outpatients
Technology
Quality of Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Psychopathology
Alcoholism
Patient Care
Mental Health
Alcohols

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kobak, K. A., Taylor, L. V. H., Dottl, S. L., Greist, J. H., Jefferson, J. W., Burroughs, D., ... Serlin, R. C. (1997). A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(11), 905-910.

A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. / Kobak, Kenneth A.; Taylor, Leslie V H; Dottl, Susan L.; Greist, John H.; Jefferson, James W.; Burroughs, Diane; Mantle, Julie M.; Katzelnick, David J; Norton, Randal; Henk, Henry J.; Serlin, Ronald C.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 278, No. 11, 17.09.1997, p. 905-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kobak, KA, Taylor, LVH, Dottl, SL, Greist, JH, Jefferson, JW, Burroughs, D, Mantle, JM, Katzelnick, DJ, Norton, R, Henk, HJ & Serlin, RC 1997, 'A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 278, no. 11, pp. 905-910.
Kobak KA, Taylor LVH, Dottl SL, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Burroughs D et al. A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997 Sep 17;278(11):905-910.
Kobak, Kenneth A. ; Taylor, Leslie V H ; Dottl, Susan L. ; Greist, John H. ; Jefferson, James W. ; Burroughs, Diane ; Mantle, Julie M. ; Katzelnick, David J ; Norton, Randal ; Henk, Henry J. ; Serlin, Ronald C. / A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997 ; Vol. 278, No. 11. pp. 905-910.
@article{b8a531858be345359c65f0030c280988,
title = "A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders",
abstract = "Context - Common mental disorders are often not identified in primary care settings. Objective - To evaluate the validity and clinical utility of a telephone-assisted computer-administered version of Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), a brief questionnaire and interview instrument designed to identify psychiatric disorders in primary care patients. Design - Comparison of diagnoses obtained by computer over the telephone using interactive voice response (IVR) technology vs those obtained by a trained clinician over the telephone using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition] Diagnosis (SCID). A subsample also received the clinician- administered version of PRIME-MD. Patients - Outpatients (N=200) from 4 primary care clinics, an eating disorders clinic, an alcohol treatment facility, psychiatric outpatients, and community controls. Setting - Interviews conducted by telephone, except for face-to-face administration of PRIME-MD, which was conducted at either the primary care clinic or a research clinic. Measurements and Main Results - Prevalence rates for any psychiatric disorder were similar between diagnoses made by the computer and those made by a mental health professional using the SCID (60.0{\%} vs 58.5{\%}). Prevalence rates for individual diagnoses were generally similar across versions. However, primary care patients reported twice as much alcohol abuse on the computer (15.0{\%}) as on either the SCID (7.5{\%}) or the clinician-administered PRIME-MD (7.5{\%}). Using the SCID as the criterion, both the computer- and clinician-administered versions of PRIME-MD demonstrated high and roughly equivalent levels of sensitivity and specificity. Overall agreement (κ) for any diagnosis was 0.67 for the computer-administered PRIME-MD and 0.70 for the clinician-administered PRIME-MD. Conclusions - The computer-administered PRIME-MD appears to be a valid instrument for assessing psychopathology in primary care patients. Interactive voice response technology allows for increased availability, and provides primary care physicians with information that will increase the quality of patient care without additional physician time and at minimal expense.",
author = "Kobak, {Kenneth A.} and Taylor, {Leslie V H} and Dottl, {Susan L.} and Greist, {John H.} and Jefferson, {James W.} and Diane Burroughs and Mantle, {Julie M.} and Katzelnick, {David J} and Randal Norton and Henk, {Henry J.} and Serlin, {Ronald C.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
day = "17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "278",
pages = "905--910",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders

AU - Kobak, Kenneth A.

AU - Taylor, Leslie V H

AU - Dottl, Susan L.

AU - Greist, John H.

AU - Jefferson, James W.

AU - Burroughs, Diane

AU - Mantle, Julie M.

AU - Katzelnick, David J

AU - Norton, Randal

AU - Henk, Henry J.

AU - Serlin, Ronald C.

PY - 1997/9/17

Y1 - 1997/9/17

N2 - Context - Common mental disorders are often not identified in primary care settings. Objective - To evaluate the validity and clinical utility of a telephone-assisted computer-administered version of Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), a brief questionnaire and interview instrument designed to identify psychiatric disorders in primary care patients. Design - Comparison of diagnoses obtained by computer over the telephone using interactive voice response (IVR) technology vs those obtained by a trained clinician over the telephone using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition] Diagnosis (SCID). A subsample also received the clinician- administered version of PRIME-MD. Patients - Outpatients (N=200) from 4 primary care clinics, an eating disorders clinic, an alcohol treatment facility, psychiatric outpatients, and community controls. Setting - Interviews conducted by telephone, except for face-to-face administration of PRIME-MD, which was conducted at either the primary care clinic or a research clinic. Measurements and Main Results - Prevalence rates for any psychiatric disorder were similar between diagnoses made by the computer and those made by a mental health professional using the SCID (60.0% vs 58.5%). Prevalence rates for individual diagnoses were generally similar across versions. However, primary care patients reported twice as much alcohol abuse on the computer (15.0%) as on either the SCID (7.5%) or the clinician-administered PRIME-MD (7.5%). Using the SCID as the criterion, both the computer- and clinician-administered versions of PRIME-MD demonstrated high and roughly equivalent levels of sensitivity and specificity. Overall agreement (κ) for any diagnosis was 0.67 for the computer-administered PRIME-MD and 0.70 for the clinician-administered PRIME-MD. Conclusions - The computer-administered PRIME-MD appears to be a valid instrument for assessing psychopathology in primary care patients. Interactive voice response technology allows for increased availability, and provides primary care physicians with information that will increase the quality of patient care without additional physician time and at minimal expense.

AB - Context - Common mental disorders are often not identified in primary care settings. Objective - To evaluate the validity and clinical utility of a telephone-assisted computer-administered version of Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), a brief questionnaire and interview instrument designed to identify psychiatric disorders in primary care patients. Design - Comparison of diagnoses obtained by computer over the telephone using interactive voice response (IVR) technology vs those obtained by a trained clinician over the telephone using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition] Diagnosis (SCID). A subsample also received the clinician- administered version of PRIME-MD. Patients - Outpatients (N=200) from 4 primary care clinics, an eating disorders clinic, an alcohol treatment facility, psychiatric outpatients, and community controls. Setting - Interviews conducted by telephone, except for face-to-face administration of PRIME-MD, which was conducted at either the primary care clinic or a research clinic. Measurements and Main Results - Prevalence rates for any psychiatric disorder were similar between diagnoses made by the computer and those made by a mental health professional using the SCID (60.0% vs 58.5%). Prevalence rates for individual diagnoses were generally similar across versions. However, primary care patients reported twice as much alcohol abuse on the computer (15.0%) as on either the SCID (7.5%) or the clinician-administered PRIME-MD (7.5%). Using the SCID as the criterion, both the computer- and clinician-administered versions of PRIME-MD demonstrated high and roughly equivalent levels of sensitivity and specificity. Overall agreement (κ) for any diagnosis was 0.67 for the computer-administered PRIME-MD and 0.70 for the clinician-administered PRIME-MD. Conclusions - The computer-administered PRIME-MD appears to be a valid instrument for assessing psychopathology in primary care patients. Interactive voice response technology allows for increased availability, and provides primary care physicians with information that will increase the quality of patient care without additional physician time and at minimal expense.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20244370858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20244370858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9302242

AN - SCOPUS:20244370858

VL - 278

SP - 905

EP - 910

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 11

ER -