A Comparison of Three Different Deep Learning-Based Models to Predict the MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Glioblastoma Using Brain MRI

Shahriar Faghani, Bardia Khosravi, Mana Moassefi, Gian Marco Conte, Bradley J. Erickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. The standard treatment for GBM consists of surgical resection followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is an important prognostic biomarker that predicts the response to temozolomide and guides treatment decisions. At present, the only reliable way to determine MGMT promoter methylation status is through the analysis of tumor tissues. Considering the complications of the tissue-based methods, an imaging-based approach is preferred. This study aimed to compare three different deep learning-based approaches for predicting MGMT promoter methylation status. We obtained 576 T2WI with their corresponding tumor masks, and MGMT promoter methylation status from, The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2021 datasets. We developed three different models: voxel-wise, slice-wise, and whole-brain. For voxel-wise classification, methylated and unmethylated MGMT tumor masks were made into 1 and 2 with 0 background, respectively. We converted each T2WI into 32 × 32 × 32 patches. We trained a 3D-Vnet model for tumor segmentation. After inference, we constructed the whole brain volume based on the patch’s coordinates. The final prediction of MGMT methylation status was made by majority voting between the predicted voxel values of the biggest connected component. For slice-wise classification, we trained an object detection model for tumor detection and MGMT methylation status prediction, then for final prediction, we used majority voting. For the whole-brain approach, we trained a 3D Densenet121 for prediction. Whole-brain, slice-wise, and voxel-wise, accuracy was 65.42% (SD 3.97%), 61.37% (SD 1.48%), and 56.84% (SD 4.38%), respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-846
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • BraTS
  • Brain tumor
  • Classification
  • Deep learning
  • MGMT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Three Different Deep Learning-Based Models to Predict the MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Glioblastoma Using Brain MRI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this