A clinical practice agreement between pharmacists and surgeons streamlines medication management

Jenna K. Lovely, David Larson, Joanna M. Quast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), which have been widely used in ambulatory care, were applied to hospital surgical teams in a postsurgical colorectal surgery unit at Mayo Clinic Rochester (Minnesota). Methods: The CPA allowed pharmacists the decision rights to initiate, modify, or discontinue medications in accordance with the surgical teams' practice standards, evidence-based medicine, and/or institutional policies without specific request and response from the surgeon/provider. Interventions for CPA and non-CPA groups were captured from a prospectively maintained database. Admission medication reconciliation (patient medication list compared with hospital orders) was compared between CPA patients and non-CPA patients. Time-to-decision and surgical service interruptions were measured by an audit of 50 CPA interventions versus 50 non-CPA interventions. Results: For the 135 CPA-eligible colorectal and general surgery patients in January-March 2011, there were 417 pharmacist interventions (3.1 per patient episode), compared with 537 for 305 non-CPA patients on a comparable surgical unit (1.8 per patient episode) (p ≤ .0200). Admission medication reconciliation was completed for 135/135 (100%) of CPA patients versus 220/305 (72%) of non-CPA patients (p ≤ .001). Rules-based interventions with CPA totaled 21/417 (5%) versus 221/537 (41%) without CPA (p ≤ .0001). The time-to-decision (CPA versus non-CPA) was within 1 minute versus 0 to 4,320 minutes (mean, 314.2 minutes; median, 138 minutes), respectively (p = .0063). Conclusion: The CPA increased pharmacist interventions and increased both accuracy and efficiency in resolving medication-related problems. The CPA streamlined and improved medication management of hospitalized surgical patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-302
Number of pages7
JournalJoint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
Volume40
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
Medication Reconciliation
Colorectal Surgery
Surgeons
Organizational Policy
Evidence-Based Medicine
Ambulatory Care
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

A clinical practice agreement between pharmacists and surgeons streamlines medication management. / Lovely, Jenna K.; Larson, David; Quast, Joanna M.

In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Vol. 40, No. 7, 2014, p. 296-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d499a060962d4396913c88610694502a,
title = "A clinical practice agreement between pharmacists and surgeons streamlines medication management",
abstract = "Background: Collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), which have been widely used in ambulatory care, were applied to hospital surgical teams in a postsurgical colorectal surgery unit at Mayo Clinic Rochester (Minnesota). Methods: The CPA allowed pharmacists the decision rights to initiate, modify, or discontinue medications in accordance with the surgical teams' practice standards, evidence-based medicine, and/or institutional policies without specific request and response from the surgeon/provider. Interventions for CPA and non-CPA groups were captured from a prospectively maintained database. Admission medication reconciliation (patient medication list compared with hospital orders) was compared between CPA patients and non-CPA patients. Time-to-decision and surgical service interruptions were measured by an audit of 50 CPA interventions versus 50 non-CPA interventions. Results: For the 135 CPA-eligible colorectal and general surgery patients in January-March 2011, there were 417 pharmacist interventions (3.1 per patient episode), compared with 537 for 305 non-CPA patients on a comparable surgical unit (1.8 per patient episode) (p ≤ .0200). Admission medication reconciliation was completed for 135/135 (100{\%}) of CPA patients versus 220/305 (72{\%}) of non-CPA patients (p ≤ .001). Rules-based interventions with CPA totaled 21/417 (5{\%}) versus 221/537 (41{\%}) without CPA (p ≤ .0001). The time-to-decision (CPA versus non-CPA) was within 1 minute versus 0 to 4,320 minutes (mean, 314.2 minutes; median, 138 minutes), respectively (p = .0063). Conclusion: The CPA increased pharmacist interventions and increased both accuracy and efficiency in resolving medication-related problems. The CPA streamlined and improved medication management of hospitalized surgical patients.",
author = "Lovely, {Jenna K.} and David Larson and Quast, {Joanna M.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "296--302",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A clinical practice agreement between pharmacists and surgeons streamlines medication management

AU - Lovely, Jenna K.

AU - Larson, David

AU - Quast, Joanna M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), which have been widely used in ambulatory care, were applied to hospital surgical teams in a postsurgical colorectal surgery unit at Mayo Clinic Rochester (Minnesota). Methods: The CPA allowed pharmacists the decision rights to initiate, modify, or discontinue medications in accordance with the surgical teams' practice standards, evidence-based medicine, and/or institutional policies without specific request and response from the surgeon/provider. Interventions for CPA and non-CPA groups were captured from a prospectively maintained database. Admission medication reconciliation (patient medication list compared with hospital orders) was compared between CPA patients and non-CPA patients. Time-to-decision and surgical service interruptions were measured by an audit of 50 CPA interventions versus 50 non-CPA interventions. Results: For the 135 CPA-eligible colorectal and general surgery patients in January-March 2011, there were 417 pharmacist interventions (3.1 per patient episode), compared with 537 for 305 non-CPA patients on a comparable surgical unit (1.8 per patient episode) (p ≤ .0200). Admission medication reconciliation was completed for 135/135 (100%) of CPA patients versus 220/305 (72%) of non-CPA patients (p ≤ .001). Rules-based interventions with CPA totaled 21/417 (5%) versus 221/537 (41%) without CPA (p ≤ .0001). The time-to-decision (CPA versus non-CPA) was within 1 minute versus 0 to 4,320 minutes (mean, 314.2 minutes; median, 138 minutes), respectively (p = .0063). Conclusion: The CPA increased pharmacist interventions and increased both accuracy and efficiency in resolving medication-related problems. The CPA streamlined and improved medication management of hospitalized surgical patients.

AB - Background: Collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), which have been widely used in ambulatory care, were applied to hospital surgical teams in a postsurgical colorectal surgery unit at Mayo Clinic Rochester (Minnesota). Methods: The CPA allowed pharmacists the decision rights to initiate, modify, or discontinue medications in accordance with the surgical teams' practice standards, evidence-based medicine, and/or institutional policies without specific request and response from the surgeon/provider. Interventions for CPA and non-CPA groups were captured from a prospectively maintained database. Admission medication reconciliation (patient medication list compared with hospital orders) was compared between CPA patients and non-CPA patients. Time-to-decision and surgical service interruptions were measured by an audit of 50 CPA interventions versus 50 non-CPA interventions. Results: For the 135 CPA-eligible colorectal and general surgery patients in January-March 2011, there were 417 pharmacist interventions (3.1 per patient episode), compared with 537 for 305 non-CPA patients on a comparable surgical unit (1.8 per patient episode) (p ≤ .0200). Admission medication reconciliation was completed for 135/135 (100%) of CPA patients versus 220/305 (72%) of non-CPA patients (p ≤ .001). Rules-based interventions with CPA totaled 21/417 (5%) versus 221/537 (41%) without CPA (p ≤ .0001). The time-to-decision (CPA versus non-CPA) was within 1 minute versus 0 to 4,320 minutes (mean, 314.2 minutes; median, 138 minutes), respectively (p = .0063). Conclusion: The CPA increased pharmacist interventions and increased both accuracy and efficiency in resolving medication-related problems. The CPA streamlined and improved medication management of hospitalized surgical patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903310874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903310874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25130012

AN - SCOPUS:84903310874

VL - 40

SP - 296

EP - 302

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

IS - 7

ER -