3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction

David Mitton, Kristin D Zhao, Samuel Bertrand, Chunfeng D Zhao, Sébastien Laporte, Chao Yang, Kai Nan An, Wafa Skalli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the ribs can be obtained from biplanar X-rays. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the inter-observer reproducibility of this technique in comparison to CT-scan reconstructions. CT scans and biplanar X-rays were obtained from 50 ribs (from three cadaveric rib cages). Three experienced experimenters reconstructed each rib from biplanar X-rays. Morphometric parameters were then computed from the rib midlines. Differences were computed between parameters obtained from the 3D reconstructions based on biplanar X-rays and from CT scans. The accuracy was computed as the mean of this difference for the 50 ribs from all three experimenters. The inter-observer variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) between the three observers. The CT-scan reconstructions were considered to be the gold standard in spite of their limitations for rib reconstructions. According to the different linear parameters, the accuracy of the reconstructions was found to be between -6 mm (-2%) and 3 mm, (4%). The accuracy of the current method was close to that of CT-scan reconstructions. The inter-observer variability was between 3% and 6%. Frontal and lateral X-rays are commonly obtained clinically, so 3D reconstructions can be used without increased radiation exposure to the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)706-710
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Computerized tomography
Ribs
X-Rays
X rays
X Ray Computed Tomography
Observer Variation
Radiation

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Biomechanics
  • Precision
  • Reconstruction
  • Rib

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction. / Mitton, David; Zhao, Kristin D; Bertrand, Samuel; Zhao, Chunfeng D; Laporte, Sébastien; Yang, Chao; An, Kai Nan; Skalli, Wafa.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2008, p. 706-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitton, David ; Zhao, Kristin D ; Bertrand, Samuel ; Zhao, Chunfeng D ; Laporte, Sébastien ; Yang, Chao ; An, Kai Nan ; Skalli, Wafa. / 3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2008 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 706-710.
@article{7e2813d726174d7fa67cef92f7572ed2,
title = "3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction",
abstract = "Subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the ribs can be obtained from biplanar X-rays. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the inter-observer reproducibility of this technique in comparison to CT-scan reconstructions. CT scans and biplanar X-rays were obtained from 50 ribs (from three cadaveric rib cages). Three experienced experimenters reconstructed each rib from biplanar X-rays. Morphometric parameters were then computed from the rib midlines. Differences were computed between parameters obtained from the 3D reconstructions based on biplanar X-rays and from CT scans. The accuracy was computed as the mean of this difference for the 50 ribs from all three experimenters. The inter-observer variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) between the three observers. The CT-scan reconstructions were considered to be the gold standard in spite of their limitations for rib reconstructions. According to the different linear parameters, the accuracy of the reconstructions was found to be between -6 mm (-2{\%}) and 3 mm, (4{\%}). The accuracy of the current method was close to that of CT-scan reconstructions. The inter-observer variability was between 3{\%} and 6{\%}. Frontal and lateral X-rays are commonly obtained clinically, so 3D reconstructions can be used without increased radiation exposure to the patient.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Biomechanics, Precision, Reconstruction, Rib",
author = "David Mitton and Zhao, {Kristin D} and Samuel Bertrand and Zhao, {Chunfeng D} and S{\'e}bastien Laporte and Chao Yang and An, {Kai Nan} and Wafa Skalli",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "706--710",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction

AU - Mitton, David

AU - Zhao, Kristin D

AU - Bertrand, Samuel

AU - Zhao, Chunfeng D

AU - Laporte, Sébastien

AU - Yang, Chao

AU - An, Kai Nan

AU - Skalli, Wafa

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the ribs can be obtained from biplanar X-rays. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the inter-observer reproducibility of this technique in comparison to CT-scan reconstructions. CT scans and biplanar X-rays were obtained from 50 ribs (from three cadaveric rib cages). Three experienced experimenters reconstructed each rib from biplanar X-rays. Morphometric parameters were then computed from the rib midlines. Differences were computed between parameters obtained from the 3D reconstructions based on biplanar X-rays and from CT scans. The accuracy was computed as the mean of this difference for the 50 ribs from all three experimenters. The inter-observer variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) between the three observers. The CT-scan reconstructions were considered to be the gold standard in spite of their limitations for rib reconstructions. According to the different linear parameters, the accuracy of the reconstructions was found to be between -6 mm (-2%) and 3 mm, (4%). The accuracy of the current method was close to that of CT-scan reconstructions. The inter-observer variability was between 3% and 6%. Frontal and lateral X-rays are commonly obtained clinically, so 3D reconstructions can be used without increased radiation exposure to the patient.

AB - Subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the ribs can be obtained from biplanar X-rays. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the inter-observer reproducibility of this technique in comparison to CT-scan reconstructions. CT scans and biplanar X-rays were obtained from 50 ribs (from three cadaveric rib cages). Three experienced experimenters reconstructed each rib from biplanar X-rays. Morphometric parameters were then computed from the rib midlines. Differences were computed between parameters obtained from the 3D reconstructions based on biplanar X-rays and from CT scans. The accuracy was computed as the mean of this difference for the 50 ribs from all three experimenters. The inter-observer variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) between the three observers. The CT-scan reconstructions were considered to be the gold standard in spite of their limitations for rib reconstructions. According to the different linear parameters, the accuracy of the reconstructions was found to be between -6 mm (-2%) and 3 mm, (4%). The accuracy of the current method was close to that of CT-scan reconstructions. The inter-observer variability was between 3% and 6%. Frontal and lateral X-rays are commonly obtained clinically, so 3D reconstructions can be used without increased radiation exposure to the patient.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Precision

KW - Reconstruction

KW - Rib

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38749115746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38749115746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.034

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 17981286

AN - SCOPUS:38749115746

VL - 41

SP - 706

EP - 710

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 3

ER -