256-and 320-row coronary CTA: Is more better?

Amy M. West; George A. Beller

doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq153

256-and 320-row coronary CTA: Is more better?

Amy M. West, George A. Beller

Cardiovascular Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1823-1825
Number of pages	3
Journal	European heart journal
Volume	31
Issue number	15
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq153
State	Published - Aug 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1093/eurheartj/ehq153

Cite this

@article{c2dcb6a177f544e79cf0541a7f405940,

title = "256-and 320-row coronary CTA: Is more better?",

author = "West, {Amy M.} and Beller, {George A.}",

year = "2010",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehq153",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "31",

pages = "1823--1825",

journal = "European Heart Journal",

issn = "0195-668X",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 256-and 320-row coronary CTA

T2 - Is more better?

AU - West, Amy M.

AU - Beller, George A.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955438957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955438957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq153

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq153

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 20494905

AN - SCOPUS:77955438957

VL - 31

SP - 1823

EP - 1825

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 15

ER -

256-and 320-row coronary CTA: Is more better?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this