2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American heart association, the Cardiological society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiología Intervencionista; Affirmation of value by the Canadian association of interventional Cardiology-association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention)

Charanjit S. Rihal, Srihari S. Naidu, Michael M. Givertz, Wilson Y. Szeto, James A. Burke, Navin K. Kapur, Morton Kern, Kirk N. Garratt, James A. Goldstein, Vivian Dimas, Thomas Tu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides a brief summary of the relevant recommendations and references related to percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. The goal was to provide the clinician with concise, evidence-based contemporary recommendations, and the supporting documentation to encourage their application. The full text includes disclosure of all relevant relationships with industry for each writing committee member. A fundamental aspect of all expert consensus statements is that these carefully developed, evidence-based documents can neither encompass all clinical circumstances, nor replace the judgment of individual physicians in management of each patient. The science of medicine is rooted in evidence, and the art of medicine is based on the application of this evidence to the individual patient. This expert consensus statement has adhered to these principles for optimal management of patients requiring percutaneous mechanical circulatory support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1112-1114
Number of pages3
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume85
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

American Heart Association
Cardiology
Hispanic Americans
India
Consensus
Equipment and Supplies
Medicine
Committee Membership
Disclosure
Documentation
Industry
Physicians

Keywords

  • cardiogenic shock
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • ventricular assist device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{289a9e50fe3e42a18f1ff0b7e34ce4b5,
title = "2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American heart association, the Cardiological society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiolog{\'i}a Intervencionista; Affirmation of value by the Canadian association of interventional Cardiology-association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention)",
abstract = "This article provides a brief summary of the relevant recommendations and references related to percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. The goal was to provide the clinician with concise, evidence-based contemporary recommendations, and the supporting documentation to encourage their application. The full text includes disclosure of all relevant relationships with industry for each writing committee member. A fundamental aspect of all expert consensus statements is that these carefully developed, evidence-based documents can neither encompass all clinical circumstances, nor replace the judgment of individual physicians in management of each patient. The science of medicine is rooted in evidence, and the art of medicine is based on the application of this evidence to the individual patient. This expert consensus statement has adhered to these principles for optimal management of patients requiring percutaneous mechanical circulatory support.",
keywords = "cardiogenic shock, percutaneous coronary intervention, ventricular assist device",
author = "Rihal, {Charanjit S.} and Naidu, {Srihari S.} and Givertz, {Michael M.} and Szeto, {Wilson Y.} and Burke, {James A.} and Kapur, {Navin K.} and Morton Kern and Garratt, {Kirk N.} and Goldstein, {James A.} and Vivian Dimas and Thomas Tu",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.25719",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1112--1114",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in Cardiovascular Care (Endorsed by the American heart association, the Cardiological society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiología Intervencionista; Affirmation of value by the Canadian association of interventional Cardiology-association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention)

AU - Rihal, Charanjit S.

AU - Naidu, Srihari S.

AU - Givertz, Michael M.

AU - Szeto, Wilson Y.

AU - Burke, James A.

AU - Kapur, Navin K.

AU - Kern, Morton

AU - Garratt, Kirk N.

AU - Goldstein, James A.

AU - Dimas, Vivian

AU - Tu, Thomas

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - This article provides a brief summary of the relevant recommendations and references related to percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. The goal was to provide the clinician with concise, evidence-based contemporary recommendations, and the supporting documentation to encourage their application. The full text includes disclosure of all relevant relationships with industry for each writing committee member. A fundamental aspect of all expert consensus statements is that these carefully developed, evidence-based documents can neither encompass all clinical circumstances, nor replace the judgment of individual physicians in management of each patient. The science of medicine is rooted in evidence, and the art of medicine is based on the application of this evidence to the individual patient. This expert consensus statement has adhered to these principles for optimal management of patients requiring percutaneous mechanical circulatory support.

AB - This article provides a brief summary of the relevant recommendations and references related to percutaneous mechanical circulatory support. The goal was to provide the clinician with concise, evidence-based contemporary recommendations, and the supporting documentation to encourage their application. The full text includes disclosure of all relevant relationships with industry for each writing committee member. A fundamental aspect of all expert consensus statements is that these carefully developed, evidence-based documents can neither encompass all clinical circumstances, nor replace the judgment of individual physicians in management of each patient. The science of medicine is rooted in evidence, and the art of medicine is based on the application of this evidence to the individual patient. This expert consensus statement has adhered to these principles for optimal management of patients requiring percutaneous mechanical circulatory support.

KW - cardiogenic shock

KW - percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - ventricular assist device

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929702074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929702074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.25719

DO - 10.1002/ccd.25719

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 1112

EP - 1114

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 7

ER -